Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Spentex Industries Ltd vs Pune Mathadi, Hamal And Other Manual ... on 25 August, 2022

Author: M. S. Karnik

Bench: Dipankar Datta, M. S. Karnik

                                                                                     904. wp 208811.doc

                      Urmila Ingale

                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
         Digitally signed
         by URMILA
URMILA   PRAMOD
         INGALE
PRAMOD   Date:
INGALE   2022.08.25
         20:17:04


                                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 2088 OF 2011
         +0530




                                      Spentex Industries Ltd.                     .. Petitioner
                                           vs.
                                      Pune Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual
                                      Workers Board and anr.                      .. Respondents

                                                               ------------
                                      Mr. N.N. Gawade i/b Sanjay Udeshi and Co. for Petitioner.
                                      Ms. Lata Desai i/b M/s. Divekar & Co. For Respondent No.1.
                                      Mr. P.P. Kakade, Government Pleader a/w Mr. B.V. Samant
                                      AGP, Ms. R.A. Salunkhe AGP and Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for
                                      State.
                                                               ------------
                                                      CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ. &
                                                                 M. S. KARNIK, J.
                                                        DATE    : AUGUST 25, 2022.

                                      P.C. :

1. It is submitted by Mr. Gawade, learned advocate that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioning company has gone into liquidation.

2. In such view of the matter and also having regard to the fact that the Official Liquidator has not shown interest to press the writ petition, the same stands dismissed as not pressed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated forthwith. No costs.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) 1