Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

V.Chandiran vs The Head Tahsildar on 18 January, 2024

Author: P.Velmurugan

Bench: P.Velmurugan

                                                                                W.P. No.35203 of 2023


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED : 18.01.2024

                                                     Coram:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                              W.P. No.35203 of 2023

                  V.Chandiran                                               ... Petitioner
                                                        Vs.
                  1. The Head Tahsildar
                     Shoolagiri Taluk,
                     Krishnagiri District
                     Pin-635 117
                     (Previously Dharmapuri District)

                  2. The Head Surveyor
                     Shoolagiri Taluk
                     Krishnagiri District
                     Pin-635 117
                     (Previously Dharmapuri District)

                  3. The Inspector of Police
                     Shoolagiri Police Station
                     Shoolagiri
                     Krishnagiri District
                     Pin-635 117
                     (Previously Dharmapuri District)                       ... Respondents
                    (R3 -Dismissed as per order dated 02.01.2024
                     in WP No.35203/2023)

                   Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                   to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first Respondent to direct the
                   second respondent to survey, measure and with marking of the Boundaries
                   and for fencing the demised property situated at Shoolagiri Village,
                  1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   W.P. No.35203 of 2023


                   Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, measuring an extent of 0.35 cents
                   comprised in Survey No.121/8, bearing Patta No.6849 within the Registration
                   District of Krishnagiri and Sub Registration District of Shoolagiri with the
                   help of the Police Protection, third Respondent.

                                         For Petitioner    : Mr.J.Harikrihsna

                                         For R1 and R2 : Mrs.V.Yamunadevi
                                                         Special Government Pleader


                                                          ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the first Respondent to direct the second respondent to survey, measure and with marking of the Boundaries and for fencing the demised property situated at Shoolagiri Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, measuring an extent of 0.35 cents comprised in Survey No.121/8, bearing Patta No.6849 within the Registration District of Krishnagiri and Sub Registration District of Shoolagiri, with the help of the Police Protection, third Respondent.

2. The 1st respondent has filed a counter affidavit dated 11.01.2024 in which it is stated that admittedly the petitioner had sent a representation on 16.05.2022 with a request to survey and measure the land. The Firka Surveyor went to the subject matter of land on 27.04.2023 to measure the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.35203 of 2023 land during which, one Tamilraj objected to measure the land and hence, the said land was not surveyed and measured. Again on 08.01.2024, the Firka Surveyor along with police went to the subject land and surveyed and measured the land and shown boundaries of the land to the petitioner and survey stones were also fixed on the boundaries of the land and that the grievances of the petitioner was redressed.

3. As per the counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent, survey was already conducted in the subject land and survey stones were also fixed on the boundaries of the land and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. If the petitioner is aggrieved with the survey, he can work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.




                                                                                          18.01.2024
                  ksa-2
                  Index        : Yes / No
                  Speaking Order : Yes / No
                  Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No



                  3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.35203 of 2023 To

1. The Head Tahsildar Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District Pin-635 117 (Previously Dharmapuri District)

2. The Head Surveyor Shoolagiri Taluk Krishnagiri District Pin-635 117 (Previously Dharmapuri District)

3. The Inspector of Police Shoolagiri Police Station Shoolagiri Krishnagiri District Pin-635 117 (Previously Dharmapuri District) 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.35203 of 2023 P.VELMURUGAN. J.

Ksa-2 W.P. No.35203 of 2023 18.01.2024 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis