Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

K.K. Spun Pipe (P) Ltd., New Delhi vs Acit, New Delhi on 16 December, 2016

                      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                          DELHI BENCH: 'SMC-II' NEW DELHI

                    BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                               I.T.A .No.-4589/Del/2016
                           (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2007-08)
                 K.K.Spun Pipe P.Ltd.,     Vs ACIT,
                 7/18A, Sarvpriya Vihar,       Circle-5(1),
                 New Delhi-110016.             New Delhi.
                 PAN-AACCK7334A
                 (APPELLANT)                   (RESPONDENT)

                 Assessee by                                None
                 Revenue by                         Sh.F.R.Meena, Sr.DR
                 Date of Hearing                         03.11.2016
                 Date of Pronouncement                   16.12.2016

                                            ORDER

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the correctness of the order dated 28.04.2016 of the CIT(A)-5, Delhi pertaining to 2007-08 AY on various grounds.

2. However, at the time of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee. The appeal was passed over twice. Even in the third round, the position remained the same. Neither the assessee was present nor any adjournment has been placed before the Bench. The record shows that notice for the specific date of hearing has been sent on 26.09.2016 to the assessee at the address mentioned in column No.10 in the memo of appeal filed which has not been come back unserved. Accordingly, it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the appeal filed. Support is drawn from the order of the Tribunals in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P).

3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show that there was a reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of hearing, it would be at liberty if so advised to pray for a recall of this order. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the open Court.

4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.

The order is pronounced in the open court on 16th of December, 2016.

Sd/-

(DIVA SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER *Amit Kumar* I.T.A .No.-4589/Del/2016 K.K.Spun Pipe P.Ltd. vs ACIT Page 2 of 2 Copy forwarded to:

1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI I.T.A .No.-4589/Del/2016 K.K.Spun Pipe P.Ltd. vs ACIT