Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

N.S. Gangemane S/O. Subbaiah Gangemane vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 April, 2013

Author: Dilip B Bhosale

Bench: Dilip B Bhosale

                          :1:


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
              CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

         DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2013

                       PRESENT

       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE

                         AND

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA

          WRIT PETITION NO.75407/2013 [S-KAT]


BETWEEN

1.    N.S. GANGEMANE,
      S/O. SUBBAIAH GANGEMANE
      AGE: 60 YEARS,
      ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF
      STATISTICS (RETIRED)
      R./AT: KARKI, POST: KARKI,
      TQ:HONNAVAR, U.K. DIST.

                                     ... PETITIONER

[BY SRI. HANAMANT R LATUR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]


AND


1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
      R/BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
      GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT
      (PLANNING AND STATISTICAL WING)
      VIDHANA SOUDHA,
      DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
      BANGALORE- 560 001.
                                  :2:


2.    THE DIRECTOR OF
      ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS
      M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE- 560 001.

3.    THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER
      (FORMERLY DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER)
      BELGAUM REGION,
      BELGAUM .

                                         ..... RESPONDENTS

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED:29/02/2012 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION NO.3952/2001 i.e. ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION NO.3952/2001 i.e. ANNEXURE-H, AS PRAYED THEREIN, ETC..

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, DILIP B BHOSALE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: -

PC:
On 18.03.2013, we granted time till today to comply office objections. Today, none appears for the petitioner. We are informed that the office objections have not been complied with till this date. In the :3: circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE Sd/-
JUDGE KGR*