Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Durga Minerals Company vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 February, 2016

Bench: Chief Justice, Ravi Malimath

                           1

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
        DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016
                        PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
                          AND
          THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
        WRIT PETITION NO.50131 OF 2015 (GM-MM-S)

BETWEEN

M/S. DURGA MINERALS COMPANY
NO.764, 8TH CROSS, 15TH MAIN
SRINIVASA NAGAR, BANK COLONY
BENGALURU-560050
REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
B.V.SATISH BABU
                                         ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI K B SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE)


AND

1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
      REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
      DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE
      VIKASA SOUDHA
      BENGALURU-560001

2.    THE DIRECTOR
      DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY
      NO.49, KHANIJA BHAVAN
      RACE COURSE ROAD
      BENGALURU-560001

3.    THE DISTRICT TASK FORCE (MINES) COMMITTEE
      OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
      CHITRADURGA-577501

4.    THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
      DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY
      CHITRADURGA-577501
                              2



5.   THE RULE 11 COMMITTEE
     CONSTITUTED UNDER RULE 11 OF
     KMMCR, 1994, PRESIDED OVER BY
     THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE
     GOVERNMENT AS CHAIRMAN
     DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE
     VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001
                                      ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI Y H VIJAYKUMAR, AGA)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.1 TO TAKE A DECISION, WHETHER
TO CLASSIFY THE MINERAL WHITE QUARTZ AS A SPECIFIED
MINOR MINERAL OR AS A NON-SPECIFIED MINERAL, IN VIEW
OF ANNEXURE-F DATED 10.02.2015 AND ETC.,


     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                           ORDER

The writ petitioner applied for grant of quarrying lease for quarrying white quartz. When he applied for such quarrying lease, white quartz was a major mineral. Therefore, the procedure for grant of quarrying lease was governed by Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

2. There has been an amendment to the provisions of the said Act and white quartz has now become minor mineral. 3

3. Therefore, the application of the writ petitioner shall have to be considered under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

4. Mr.Y.H.VIjaykumar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, submits that as the application was submitted at a point of time when white quartz was a major mineral, in view of the change of law, the application becomes infructuous.

5. We regret that we cannot accept such prayer. The application is still pending before the State. It shall be considered by the State under the prevalent Rules.

6. It is submitted that the classification has not reached finality. However, the government has proposed to classify white quartz as a non-specified mineral.

7. We, therefore, direct the Chief Secretary, Department of Industries and Commerce, to convene a meeting of the Task Force and to consider the application of the writ petitioner for grant of quarrying lease under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994, proceeding on the basis that white quartz is a non-specified mineral, 4 within three months from the date of communication of this order.

8. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

9. We make no order as to costs.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE bkv