Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Mumtaz Begum vs The State Of Assam And 5 Ors on 22 November, 2021

Author: Michael Zothankhuma

Bench: Michael Zothankhuma

                                                                 Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010191512021




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/6154/2021

         MUMTAZ BEGUM
         W/O. LT. SHARIFUDDIN AHMED, VILL. NALIAPOOL, NABAJYOTI PATH,
         P.O. GRAHAM BAZAR, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM.



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
         TO BE REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC
         WORKS BUILDING AND N.H. DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.

         2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY.
         TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          FINANCE DEPTT.
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-06.

         3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY.
         TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPTT.
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-06.

         4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER

          PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. (NH WORK)
          ASSAM
          CHANDMARI
          GUWAHATI-03.

         5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

          P.W.D.
                                                                                   Page No.# 2/3

            DIBRUGARH NH DIVISION
            DIBRUGARH
            ASSAM.

            6:THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM

            MAIDAMGAON
            BELTOLA
            GUWAHATI-29

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM


                                 BEFORE
               HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

                                           ORDER

Date : 22.11.2021 Heard Mr. H. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner's husband was appointed as a Work Charge Tracer vide Order dated 14.05.1985 and that the petitioner's husband died on 19.12.2014. However, the service of the petitioner's husband was never regularized and as such, no pension was paid to the petitioner.

The petitioner's case is that though the petitioner is not entitled to regularization in terms of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of State of Assam & Ors. Vs. Sri. Upen Das , reported in (2017) 4 GLR 493, the petitioner's case for regularization is covered by the case of Prem Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh , reported in (2019) 10 SCC 516. He accordingly submits that a supernumerary post should be created for one day so that the service of the petitioner's husband is regularized, to enable the petitioner to receive pension/pensionary benefits.

Issue notice returnable in four weeks.

Mr. R. Dhar accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 & 5 and Mr. R.K. Talukdar accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 6. Mr. R. Borpujari accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 7.

Page No.# 3/3 List the matter after 4 (four) weeks.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant