Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Deepak Nitrite Limited vs Union Of India & 2 on 23 June, 2016

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, A.J. Shastri

                  C/SCA/8525/2016                                               ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                     SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8525 of 2016

         ==========================================================
                           DEEPAK NITRITE LIMITED....Petitioner(s)
                                         Versus
                            UNION OF INDIA & 2....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR ANAND NAINAWATI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI

                                      Date : 23/06/2016
                                       ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. The petitioner has challenged action of the respondents in limiting the petitioner's export incentive on incremental growth in exports for the period between 01.04.2013 and 31.03.2014 to a sum of Rs. 1 crore. According to the calculations of the petitioner, such incentive works out to Rs. 1,74,88,814/-.

2. Learned counsel Mr. Nainawati for the petitioner submitted that, after filing the petition, the petitioner came upon a circular issued by DGFT by virtue of which, the ceiling of the benefit of Rs. 1 crore has been lifted. On the basis of such circular, the petitioner would like to approach the authorities for granting remainder of the benefits.

Page 1 of 2

HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Fri Jun 24 02:53:33 IST 2016 C/SCA/8525/2016 ORDER

3. Under the circumstances, the petitioner shall make a representation to the appropriate authority latest by 30.06.2016. It is expected that the authority shall take a decision thereon and communicate the same to the petitioner preferably by 31.08.2016. If, thereafter, the petitioner has any grievance, it would be open for the petitioner to seek redressal thereof. Petition is disposed of.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (A.J. SHASTRI, J.) Jyoti Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Fri Jun 24 02:53:33 IST 2016