Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Eldho K.Joseph vs The Authority Under Kerala Payment on 9 May, 2014

Author: A. Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

      THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/22ND POUSHA, 1938

                    WP(C).No. 12042 of 2015 (E)
                    ----------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
-------------

            ELDHO K.JOSEPH,
            S/O.K.P.JOSEPH,
            RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.26/639 KUZHIKKATTIL (H),
            CHAVARA ROAD,
            KONTHURUTHY, THEVARA-682 013.


            BY ADVS.SRI.P.M.MOHAMMED SHIRAZ
                    SMT.G.R.MANJU

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

          1. THE AUTHORITY UNDER KERALA PAYMENT
            OF SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE ACT
            1972 & DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER,
            DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, CIVIL STATION,
            KAKKANAD P.O., KOCHI-682 030.

          2. NAVY EDUCATION SOCIETY,
            REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN,
            SCHOOL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE,
            NAVY CHILDREN SCHOOL, KOCHI-682 004.


            R1  BY ADV. SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S. GOPINATHAN
            R2  BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
            R2  BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATH
            R2  BY ADV. SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS
            R2  BY ADV. SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI
            R2  BY ADV. SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN
            R2  BY ADV. SRI.KURYAN THOMAS

      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD  ON
      12-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:




EL

WP(C).No. 12042 of 2015 (E)
----------------------------

                             APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
     EXT.P1- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF SAC NO.3/2014 FILED BY
             PETITIONER

     EXT.P2- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.NCS/HQ/B25 DATED
             9.5.2014 OF COMMANDER & DIRECTOR NCS (K)

     EXT.P3- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPLY DATED 19.10.2014 FILED BY
             PETITIONER

     EXT.P4- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER
             NO.CBSE/AFF/DS/PA/2012/513932 DATED 15.1.2013 OF CBSE

     EXT.P5- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF LETTER NO.NCS/HQ/B25 DATED 30.10.2014
             OF COMMANDER & DIRECTOR NCS (K)

     EXT.P6- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER DATED 18.3.2015 IN SAC
             NO.3/2014 OF 1ST RESPONDENT

     EXT.P7- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF APPLICATION DATED 24.3.2015

     EXT.P8- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF REPLY DATED 31.3.2015 OF CAPTAIN-AT-
             ARMS, PIO

     EXT.P9- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF STATEMENT DATED 15.10.2012 FILED ON
             BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C).23527/2012

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

     R2(A)   TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10.03.2014 ISSUED BY THE
             PRINCIPAL, NAVY CHILDREN SCHOOL, KOCHI


     R2(B)   TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21.11.2014 TO THE DEPUTY
             LABOUR COMMISSIONER ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR, NAVY
             CHILDREN SCHOOL, KOCHI




                                               TRUE COPY




                                              P.S. TO JUDGE



EL



            A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
            --------------------------------------------------
                 W.P.(C) No. 12042 of 2015
            --------------------------------------------------
         Dated this the 12th day of January, 2017


                       J U D G M E N T

1.The petitioner was an employee under the 2nd respondent, which is run by a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The petitioner was suspended from service. His claim for subsistence allowance was rejected by Ext.P6 order. It is challenging this order, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

2.It appears that during the period of suspension, some amount was paid towards subsistence allowance. The petitioner was employed as Physical Education Teacher. Earlier, he had approached this Court challenging the disciplinary proceedings. This Court did not interfere with the disciplinary proceedings, stating that the dispute is between an individual and a private entity. In fact, an order in a writ appeal has W.P.(C) No. 12042 of 2015 ..2..

been referred in the impugned order, stating that the 2nd respondent is not a State undertaking or public sector undertaking as it does not receive any amount from the State or Central Government. It has been observed that it is purely an unaided school managed by the society. In the impugned order, the authority found that the Kerala Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act does not apply to the school run by the society. The period of suspension was 21.04.2012 to 12.03.2013. The authority, noting the fact that the school is affiliated with CBSE under the Government Aided Category with effect from 04.06.2012, found that the Kerala Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act would not apply to the school.

3.It is to be noted that the society is a private entity. The nature of affiliation with CBSE cannot be held against an employee unless the establishment itself becomes a Department of Government or similar establishment as referred in Section 2(c) r/w Section 5(a) of the Kerala W.P.(C) No. 12042 of 2015 ..3..

Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act. The exclusion is only in respect of certain public undertakings of Central Government. It is to be noted that there is no case that the society has to be treated as a State undertaking or a public sector undertaking. Nobody has any dispute regarding the character of the society. Nature of the society continues to be a private entity. In that scenario, this Court is of the view that nature of affiliation with CBSE is of no consequence.

4.Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside. The authority shall reconsider the matter after hearing both sides. Needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

5.The writ petition is disposed of, as above.

Sd/-

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bka/-