Karnataka High Court
Shri. Kallanagouda S/O Basanagoud ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2011
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda
Bench: A.N. Venugopala Gowda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18™ DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 67389- 96/20 L1L8- ele) BETWEEN: to SHRI. KALLANAGOUDA, : S/O BASANAGOUD BASANAGOUDRA, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: MEMBEF OF GRAM PANCHAYAT, NANDI KATTA, TQ. MUNCAGOD, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA. SRi. DANAPPA: Ne. KABBER, AGE: 45 YEARS; OCC: MEMBER OF GRAM. PANCHAYAT, NANDI KATTA, ar TQ. MiINDAGOD,- DIST. UTTAR ® KANNADA. (By $ Sri. S PATIL, ADV.) AND "THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO DEPT OF . RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATRAG, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SIRSI SUB-DIVISION, SIRSI, . PETITIONERS DIST: UTTAR KANNADA, THE SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT, NANDI KATTA, TQ. MUNDGOD, UTTAR KANNADA. had GRAM PANCHAYAT, NANDIKATTA TQ. MUNDGOD, . UTTAR KANNADA, 5. SRI. BASAVANNEPPA S/O NINGAPPA KOTAGUNASI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: PRESIDENT, oe GRAM PANCHAYAT, NANDIKATTA. | TQ. MUNDGOD, UTTAR KANNADA. - / oo... RESPONDENTS (By Smt. K.Vidyavathi, AGA for RL-R2, notice not erdered to R3-R5) This petitiori is filed under. Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying te quash the impugned notice dated 21/10/2011, issued by the respondent No.2 in Form NO.2 as per Annexure-D. This petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, this Court made. the following: ORDER
| These "writ petitions are against a meeting notice dated 21.10.2011 as at Annexure-D. The meeting was scheduled to take place on 11.11.2011. Learned AGA "appearing for respondents 1 and 2 submits that, the a >) meeting scheduled to take place on 11. 11.2011 could not meet on account of want of quorum and hence, the an respondent dissolved the meeting in exercise of the wower . under sub-rule (6) of 3 of Karnataka Panch ayat Re} (Motion of No-Confidence against. 'Adhyaksha- and ; Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. eo :
to learned AGA, subsequently moiion of. 'no "confidence has also been cancelled.
2. Keeping it in view ithe said subseq rent development, Sri A.S.Patil learned counsel appear! ng for the petitioners submits tn at, "the . writ - petit ors do not survive for consideration.
in view of the submissions made by the learned
- counsel on both sides, the writ petitions do not survive for ° consideration and stand disposed of accordingly, with no order as to-costs.
" Sd/-
JUDGE Ksj*