Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

The Director Of vs T. Anbalagan on 26 April, 2006

Bench: P. Sathasivam, J.A.K. Sampathkumar

       

  

  

 
 
 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Dated: 26/04/2006 

Coram 

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. SATHASIVAM   
and 
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.A.K. SAMPATHKUMAR     

Review Application No.141 of 2004
Review Application No.142 of 2004
and WAMP.No.5652 of 2004    

1. The Director of
   Handlooms and 
   Textiles, Kuralagam
   Chennai 108.

2. The Assistant Director of
   Handlooms and Textiles
   Kacnheepuram.                                 .. Applicants

-Vs-

T. Anbalagan 
President of Kancheepuram  
Sri Varadarajaswamy Silk 
Handloom Weavers Co.operative  
Society, Kancheepuram.                          .. Respondents

                Review Applications filed under Order 47 Rule  I  r/w  114  of
C.P.C.   against  the  order  made  in  W.A.Nos.221  and  222  of  1999  dated
22.04.2004.

!For applicant :  Mr.  D.  Krishnakumar
                Spl.  Govt., Pleader

^For Respondent         .....

:COMMON ORDER      

(Order of the Court was made by P. SATHASIVAM,J.) The above review applications have been filed against the order dated 22.04.2004 made in W.A.Nos.221 and 222 of 1999 in and by which the Division Bench confirmed the order of the learned single Judge, quashing the show cause notice on the gr he same is hit by second proviso to subsection (1) of Section 87 of Tamil Nadu Co.operative Societies Act, 1983. Now, learned Special Government Pleader seeks permission / liberty to proceed against the respondent under Section 90 of the Tamil Nadu Co. operative Societies Act or to seek any remedy as per law.

2. On this ground, we are not inclined to entertain the above review applications. However, it is made clear that if any of the provisions of the Co.operative Societies Act enables the Department to proceed against the respondent, and if th ermissible they are free to proceed in accordance with law.

With the above observation, these review applications are dismissed. Consequently, connected WAMP., is also dismissed.