Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 5]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Manish Jain vs Haryana State Pollution Control Board on 20 November, 2020

Bench: Navin Sinha, K.M. Joseph

     ITEM NO.26                              Court 11 (Video Conferencing)                 SECTION II-B

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F             I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5385/2020

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-10-2020
     in CRMM No. 31881/2020 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana
     at Chandigarh)

     MANISH JAIN                                                                      Petitioner(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     HARYANA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD                                            Respondent(s)

     (With IA No. 112593/2020                        -     EXEMPTION       FROM   FILING    C/C    OF    THE
     IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

     Date : 20-11-2020 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

     For Petitioner(s)
                                          Mr.    Ankit Swarup, AOR
                                          Mr.    G. K. Budhiraja, Adv.
                                          Mr.    Jawad Tariq, Adv.
                                          Mr.    Tushar Budhiraja, Adv.
     For Respondent(s)
                                          Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv.

                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                   O R D E R

The petitioner was granted regular bail in a prosecution under Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986. Suffice it is to observe that the bail then came to be cancelled because of non-appearance. Proceedings under Section 174A IPC ensued leading to his arrest pursuant Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Nidhi Ahuja to which he was released on bail. The petitioner now seeks Date: 2020.11.20 16:51:34 IST Reason: anticipatory bail pursuant to the cancellation of the 1 SLP (Crl.) No. 5385/2020 regular bail granted to him under Section 15 of the Act.

A person released on bail is already in the constructive custody of law. If the law requires him to come back to custody for specified reasons, we are afraid that an application for anticipatory bail apprehending arrest will not lie. There cannot be an apprehension of arrest by a person already in the constructive custody of the law. We, therefore, reject the prayer for anticipatory bail.

But, if the petitioner surrenders within two weeks from today and seeks regular bail, we direct that it shall be considered on the very same day.

Advance copy shall be served on the public prosecutor to facilitate the hearing.

Any such application for regular bail has to be considered on its own merits including the fact that originally he had been released on bail and such other grounds that may be raised without being prejudiced by our present order.

The special leave petition stands disposed of. Pending application stands disposed of.

            (NIDHI AHUJA)                                 (NISHA TRIPATHI)
              AR-cum-PS                                    BRANCH OFFICER



                                                                                              2