Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

G.K. Uma Shankar @ Gokul Raj vs Basanth Kumar Patil on 16 October, 2017

Author: B.Veerappa

Bench: B. Veerappa

                            1

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

         DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017

                         BEFORE

           THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA

            WRIT PETITION NO. 8486/2017(GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

G.K. UMASHANKAR @ GOKUL RAJ,
SON OF SRI L. GOPALAKRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
NO.9, KEMPANNA LANE,
GOKUL COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR,
NAGARTHPET,
BANGALORE-560002.                       ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI D. R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.     BASANTH KUMAR PATIL,
       SON OF T. K. PATIL,
       AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
       BASANTH GROUP OF COMPANIES,
       NO.176, GANDHINAGAR,
       BANGALORE-09.

2.     SMT. RAJITHAMMA,
       W/O SRI L GOPALKRISHANA,
       SINCE DEAD BY LR.
       SMT. GOWRI
       W/O SHREEDHAR,
       AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
       NO.479/2, SIMHADRI,
       3RD MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGE,
       4TH BLOCK, HRB LAYOUT,
       BENGALURU -560043.
                            2

3.   SRI G.K. SURESH,
     S/O SRI L. GOAPALAKRISHNA,
     AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

4.   SRI G.K. RAMESH @ BALARAM,
     S/O SRI L. GOAPALAKRISHNA,
     AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

     RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 ARE
     R/A NO.9, KEMPANNA LANE,
     GOKUL COMPLEX,
     1ST FLOOR, NAGARTHPET,
     BANGALORE-560002.                 ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI H. R. ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
VIDE ORDER DATED 12.07.2017;
NOTICE R2 TO R4 IS HELD SUFFICIENT)
                           ...

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE
ORDERS AT ANNEXURE-E DATED 23.1.2017 PASSED BY THE
26TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT
MAYOHALL, BENGALURU IN F.D.P NO.25005/2016 IN IA NO.3.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                        ORDER

The learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition. 3

2. In view of the memo filed, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, I.A.1/2017 is dismissed as not pressed as it does not survive for consideration.

Sd/-

Judge Nsu/-