Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi District Court

Memo Of Parties vs M/S. Srodeep Polymers Ltd on 30 March, 2011

 IN THE COURT OF SHRI VIKRAM­ CIVIL JUDGE  OF (NORTH) 
               DISTRICT, AT TIS HAZARI COURT­DELHI


                                 Suit No.1097/06


Unique ID No.02401C0402982006
MEMO OF PARTIES:
M/s SCJ Plastic Limited
F­3/10­11, Okhla Industrial Area,
Phase­I,
New Delhi­110020
                                                                       ...........Plaintiff
                                       VERSUS
M/s. Srodeep Polymers Ltd.
B­2/11, Site ­B,
Suraj Industrial Area,
Greater Noida (U.P.)
Office at
N­4, Kalka Ji
New Delhi­110019
                                                                     ..........Defendant
Date of Institution:09.05.2006
Date of Judgment:30.03.2011
                    Suit For Recovery of Rs.95,130/­


                                      Judgment
         This   is   a   suit   for   recovery   of   Rs.95,130/(   Rupees   Ninety   Five 

thousand   One   Hundred   Thirty   only)   filed   by   the   plaintiff   against   the 

defendant.

        The brief facts of the present case as per the plaintiff are that plaintiff 

is a limited company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and 


                                             1                          Suit No.1097/06
 Sh.  Virender   Sharma,  Account  Assistant  of   the  plaintiff  company   is   duly 

authorized to sign, verify, institute and pursue the present suit on behalf of 

the plaintiff. As pert the plaintiff, against the order of the defendant at the 

office of the plaintiff from 15.02.2003 to 31.07.2003 vide different bills, the 

defendant purchased from the plaintiff master batches worth Rs. 1,80,629/­. 

on credit upto 30 days. The said material was supplied by the plaintiff to the 

defendant and defendant acknowledged the receipt of the said material. The 

payment was to be made by the defendant to the plaintiff. Defendants had 

made some part payment out of total sum of Rs. 1,81,027/­ and Rs. 46,428/­ 

is still outstanding towards the defendant, which the defendant failed to pay 

to the  plaintiff  despite  repeated  demands  by  the plaintiff.  As  per plaintiff 

defendant   is   liable   to   pay   agreed   interest   @   24%   per   annum   on   the 

outstanding amount of Rs. 46,428/­.  A sum of Rs. 16,720/­ is also due from 

the defendant on account of additional sales tax and penalty. Thus, as on 

the date of filing of the suit the defendant is liable to pay a sum of Rs. 

95,130/­ (  46,428/­ as  principal   +  31,982/­  as interest  +  Rs. 16,720/­ as 

additional sales tax and penalty).

       Plaintiff sent legal notice dated 11.06.2005 to the defendant which 

was duly replied by the defendant on 13.07.2005. The reply was duly replied 

by the plaintiff. But till date, the plaintiff has neither received any payment 

nor any reply to the said reply dated 05.08.2002, hence filed the present suit 

for the recovery of the outstanding amount.    

       Defendant was served and filed his leave to defend application on 

05.10.2006

. Thereafter the matter was fixed for arguments on leave to 2 Suit No.1097/06 defend application, but no one appeared for more than 4 years to agrue on the application. Hence, same was dismissed for the reason of non appearance of the defendant.

Since the suit has been filed under provisions of order XXXVII of Civil Procedure Code, and leave to defend application filed by the defendant is dismissed for his non appearance, the suit is decreed for a sum of Rs.95,130/­ along with interest @10% per annum. Cost of the suit is also awarded in favour of the plaintiff.




Announced in the open Court                                  VIKRAM
On 30.03.2011                                                CJ­02 (North)/Delhi
                                                             30.03.2011




                                              3                         Suit No.1097/06
 30.03.2011                                            Suit No.1097/06


Present:     None.

Vide separate judgment suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. File be consigned to record room.

VIKRAM CJ­02 (North)/Delhi 30.03.2011 4 Suit No.1097/06 5 Suit No.1097/06