Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Arri Production House vs Frankfinn Entertainment Company Pvt. ... on 30 January, 2026

Author: Pankaj Mithal

Bench: Pankaj Mithal

                                                                    SLP (CRIMINAL) DIARY NO.33751/2025


     ITEM NO.34                                 COURT NO.9                 SECTION II-D

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                         SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) DIARY NO(S). 33751/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-09-2024
     in CRLMC No. 816/2023 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New
     Delhi]

     ARRI PRODUCTION HOUSE & ANR.                                            PETITIONER(S)

                                                       VERSUS

     FRANKFINN ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY PVT. LTD                                RESPONDENT(S)

     (IA No. 196239/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
     IA No. 196240/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT)

     Date : 30-01-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI


     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
                                        Mr. Anand Shankar, AOR
                                        Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv.
                                        Mr. Devender Singh, Adv.


     For Respondent(s)


                              UPON hearing the counsel the court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Delay condoned.

3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are Signature Not Verified not inclined to interfere with the condition of deposit Digitally signed by geeta ahuja of 20% of the cheque amount as an interim compensation, Date: 2026.01.31 10:33:59 IST Reason: passed by the Trial Court and upheld by the High Court. 1 SLP (CRIMINAL) DIARY NO.33751/2025

4. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

5. The petitioner is at liberty to get the case decided expeditiously before the Trial Court.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

   (Nidhi Mathur)                                       (Geeta Ahuja)
Court Master (NSH)                                Assistant Registrar-cum-PS




                                       2