Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad

Shailesh Kumar Kaushal vs Dgqa, D/O Defence Production on 22 December, 2025

                                                                    (Open Court)
                       Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad
                                   Bench Allahabad
                                          ****
                         Original Application No. 329 of 2020
                         This the 22nd Day of December, 2025
         Present:
         Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (J)
         1. Shailesh Kumar Kaushal, J.T.O (S), CAQ (T & C), DGQA Complex
         Ashok Path Kanpur, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Sri Devi Prasad
         Gupta, Resident of House No. 37 M.I.G. Hemant Vihar Sector-3 Barra-2
         Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh-208027.

         2. Arindam Banerjee, AE (QA), SQAE (GS) DGQA Complex Ashok
         Path Kanpur, aged about 48 years, Son of Sri Samir Kumar Banerjee,
         Resident of House No. 302, 3rd Floor, Shri Sai Tower, 28, Block-D
         Shyam Nagar, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh- 208013
                                                               ....Applicant
         By Advocates: Shri Anil Kumar Singh
                                       Versus
         1. Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence
         Production 136 South Block, New Delhi.

         2. The Director General of Quality Assurance, Government of India
         Ministry of Defence Production- DGQA (Stores), Nirman Bhawan P.O.
         New Delhi.

         3. The ADDL. DGQA (S), Department of Defence Production, DGQA
         G- Block, New Delhi.

         4. Senior Quality Assurance Officer, Senior Quality Assurance
         Establishment, DGQA Complex, Ashok Path, Kanpur Cantt- 208004.

                                                                 ...Respondents
         By Advocate: Shri Raj Pal Singh

                                         ORDER

Heard Shri Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Raj Pal Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the reliefs, as claimed by the applicants, have already been granted to the applicants, SAHIL SHARMA hence, the matter has become infructuous and the same be dismissed as having become infructuous.

Page 1 of 2

3. Under these circumstances, the instant Original Application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

4. Interim Relief, if any, stands vacated.

5. M.A., if any stand disposed of accordingly. No costs.

(Justice Rajiv Joshi) Member (J) SahilSharma/-

SAHIL SHARMA Page 2 of 2