Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Arunachala Kumar vs The Commissioner on 17 March, 2021

Bench: Sanjib Banerjee, Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

                                                                            W.P.No.6744 of 2021



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED:   17.03.2021

                                                     CORAM :

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                         AND
                               THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
                                               W.P.No.6744 of 2021
                                                       and
                                               WMP.No.7301 of 2021


                     M.Arunachala Kumar                               ...   petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                     1.The Commissioner
                       Greater Chennai Corporation.
                       Ribbon Palace,
                       Poonamallee High Road,
                       Chennai – 600 003.

                     2.The Assistant Commissioner
                       No.115, LB Road, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai,
                       Adyar, Chennai – 600 020.

                     3.The Zonal Officer (Zone – VI)
                       Greater Chennai Corporation,
                       Chennai.

                     4.G.Subramani                                    ...   respondents


                     Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for

                     issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3


                     __________
                     Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                   W.P.No.6744 of 2021



                     herein        to   consider   the   representations   dated   28.01.2020     and

                     09.03.2020 and to take action as against the illegal construction of the

                     4th Respondent at No.123/1, Draupathiamman First Cross Street,

                     Velachery, Chennai 600 042.

                               For Petitioner      :      Mr.K.Chandrasekaran

                               For Respondents :          Mrs.Karthika Ashok
                                                          Standing Counsel for R1 to R3

                                                            ORDER

(made by SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.) The writ petitioner, who is a resident of Velachery, complains of the alleged illegal construction of a building by the fourth respondent herein without the requisite building permit from the Chennai Corporation.

2. The writ petitioner states that two representations were issued on 28.01.2020 and 09.03.2020 but the Greater Chennai Corporation has failed to take action thereon.

3. Mrs.Karthika Ashok, learned standing counsel for the Greater Chennai Corporation, accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. __________ Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.6744 of 2021 She states that the representations would be considered and disposed of by a reasoned order within a reasonable time limit.

4. Consequently, without examining the merits or tenability of the representations dated 28.01.2020 and 09.03.2020, respondents 1 to 3 are directed to consider such representations and dispose of the same by a reasoned order after providing a reasonable opportunity to all parties affected thereby, including the fourth respondent herein. In view of the fact that the merits of the matter have not been examined and because the official respondents have been directed to hear the fourth respondent before taking action, the writ petition is being disposed of without notice to the fourth respondent. The aforementioned reasoned order shall be issued within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. W.P.No.6744 of 2021 is disposed on the above terms. Consequently, W.M.P.No.7301 of 2021 is closed. There will be no order as to costs.

                                                                       (S.B., CJ.)      (S.K.R., J.)
                                                                                 17.03.2021

                     Index : No
                     tar/rrg


                     __________
                     Page 3 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.6744 of 2021 To:

1.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation.

Ribbon Palace, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai – 600 003.

2.The Assistant Commissioner No.115, LB Road, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020.

3.The Zonal Officer (Zone – VI) Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai.

__________ Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.6744 of 2021 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

(tar/rrg) W.P.No.6744 of 2021 17.03.2021 __________ Page 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/