Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 8]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Rana Khan vs State Of Chhattisgarh 13 Wpc/1576/2018 ... on 9 October, 2018

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                                                  NAFR

            HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                         WPC No. 2844 of 2018

     1. Smt. Rana Khan W/o Shabbir Khan Aged About 55 Years R/o 17
        Chandra Nagar, Kohka, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh

     2. Mustaq Khan S/o Faqir Mohammad Khan Aged About 42 Years
        R/o 17 Chandra Nagar, Kohka, Tehsil And District Durg
        Chhattisgarh

     3. Balwindar Kour W/o Suchchain Singh Aged About 53 Years
        Transport Nagar, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh

     4. Suchchain Singh S/o Karnail Singh Aged About 50 Years
        Transport Nagar, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh

     5. Dilip Kumar Sahu S/o Gaitram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Nandu
        Kirana Store, Son Darshan Mandir Camp, Tehsil And District
        Durg Chhattisgarh

     6. Baljindar Singh S/o Gurudayal Aged About 51 Years Transport
        Nagar, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh

                                                          ---- Petitioner

                                 Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of
        Urban Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District
        Raipur Chhattisgarh

     2. Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Through Its Commissioner,
        Municipal Corporation Bhilai, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh

                                                       ---- Respondents

For Petitioners Shri Mahendra Dubey, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Anand Dadariya, GA Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 09/10/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that since there are many defects in the writ petition, he may be permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to prefer a duly constituted writ petition afresh.

2. Prayer allowed.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for.

Sd/-

Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala