Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Smt. Urmila Devi vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 10 September, 2020

Bench: Uday Umesh Lalit, Ajay Rastogi

                                                                                      1

      ITEM NO.13                           COURT NO.4             SECTION II
                                (HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

                                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

      Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.2646/2020

      (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-03-2020
      in CRMBA No.8239/2020 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
      Allahabad)

      SMT. URMILA DEVI                                                Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS

      STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.                                   Respondent(s)

      (IA No.72159/2020 - FOR PERMISSION; IA No.46657/2020 – FOR
      EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT; and, IA
      No.46659/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

      WITH
      SLP(Crl) No.2901/2020 (II)
      (IA No.53108/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT; IA
      No.53105/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
      JUDGMENT; IA No.53106/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; IA
      No.53109/2020 – FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/
      ANNEXURES)


      Date : 10-09-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today.

      CORAM :
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

      Counsel for the Parties:

                                    Mr. P.K. Mittal, Adv.
                                    Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR
                                    Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Adv.

                                    Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv.
                                    Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, Adv.
                                    Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR
Signature Not Verified


                                    Mr. D.K. Garg, Adv.
Digitally signed by Dr.
Mukesh Nasa
Date: 2020.09.11
16:11:15 IST
Reason:                             Mr. Dhananjay Garg, AOR
                                    Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv.
                                                                     2



           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                             O R D E R

Heard Mr. P.K. Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.K. Garg, learned counsel for Sunny Saini [respondent no.2 in SLP (Crl.) No.2646 of 2020] and Suraj Saini [respondent no.2 in SLP (Crl.) No.2901 of 2020], whose release on bail is under challenge. With the assistance of the learned counsel for both the sides, we have gone through the record.

We find no reason to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India in these matters. The Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

     (MUKESH NASA)                        (PRADEEP KUMAR)
     COURT MASTER                         BRANCH OFFICER