Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Kumari Rashmika vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 18 May, 2013

Author: Kishore Kumar Mandal

Bench: Kishore Kumar Mandal

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.889 of 2009
                 ======================================================
                 Kumari Rashmika wife of Arbind Kumar Thakur, resident of village
                 Bhagwatpur, Police Station Sarairanjan, Dist. Samastipur.
                                                                        .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 1. The State Of Bihar
                 2. Lalit Kumar Rajak, Deputy Superintendent of Education, Samastipur.
                 3. Upendra Choudhary, Block Education officer, Sarai Ranjan Block
                    District Samastipur.
                 4. Ramendra Ray, Co-ordinator Bharti Shiksha Samiti Bishambhar Sadan,
                    Basisth Narayan Path , Kadam Kuan Patna.
                 5. Jay Krishna Jha, District Co-ordinator Bharti Shiksha Samiti Sundram
                    Bhawan, Vivek Bihar, Mohanpur Road, Samastipur.
                 6. Poonam Kumari wife of Om Prakash Bhagat Warden Kasturba Gandhi
                    Girls School, Bathua Bujurg Block Sarai Ranjan, Dist. Samastipur.
                                                                       .... .... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :    None
                 For the Respondent/s      : Mr. (Sc-15)

                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR
                 MANDAL
                 ORAL ORDER


6   18-01-2013

Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application. Learned AC to SC- 15 for the State is present.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the State informs the Court that the present application arises out of an interim order passed by this Court in CWJC No. 9902 of 2008 which subsequently was dismissed.

From the marginal note(s) also it appears that the CWJC No. 9902 of 2008 has been dismissed for non-prosecution Patna High Court MJC No.889 of 2009 (6) dt.18-01-2013 Page 2 /2 on 22.06.2011. That seems to be the reasons for non- appearance of the petitioner to press this application. Consequently, the application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/-