Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Union Of India Ministry Of Def vs Bajrang Lal Berlia & Anr. on 4 July, 2011

Author: Prashant Kumar

Bench: Prashant Kumar

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                     F.A. No. 03 of 2005
                                            With
              F.A. No. 04 of 2005, F.A. No. 05 of 2005, F.A. No. 06 of 2005,
              F.A. No. 07 of 2005, F.A. No. 08 of 2005, F.A. No. 09 of 2005,
              F.A. No. 10 of 2005, F.A. No. 11 of 2005, F.A. No. 12 of 2005,
              F.A. No. 13 of 2005, F.A. No. 939 of 2006 & F.A. No. 940 of 2006
                                         ------
            Union of India, Ministry of Defence through
            Defence Estates Officer                    ......   Appellant

                                       Versus
            Sita Ram and Anr.                   ....   ...         Respondents
                                       ------
            CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR
                                   ------
            For the Appellants     :      Mrs. Shubha Jha, Advocate
            For the Respondents    :
                                          -----

39 /04.07.2011

These appeals will be heard.

Lower court records have already received. Respondents already appeared in F.A. No. 03 of 2005, F.A. No. 04 of 2005, F.A. No. 05 of 2005, F.A. No. 06 of 2005, F.A. No. 07 of 2005, F.A. No. 08 of 2005, F.A. No. 09 of 2005, F.A. No. 10 of 2005, F.A. No. 11 of 2005, F.A. No. 12 of 2005, F.A. No. 13 of 2005 and F.A. No. 939 of 2006, hence no notice required to be issued in these appeals. However, respondent not appeared in F.A. No.940 of 2006. Thus, issue notice on respondents in F.A. No.940 of 2006, for which requisites etc. under registered cover with A/D as well as by ordinary process must be filed within one week, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench.

It is submitted that an execution case has already been filed in the court below, but court below is not proceeding with the execution case, because of the pendency of these appeals. It is made clear that there is no stay of execution proceeding in these appeals.

Under the said circumstance, the executing court (Land Acquisition Judge, Hazaribagh) is directed to proceed with the execution case and pass order for realization of the money in accordance with law.

(Prashant kumar, J) R.K.