Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court - Orders

Sachida Nand Sharma @ Sachu Singh & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 6 October, 2015

Author: Kishore Kumar Mandal

Bench: Kishore Kumar Mandal

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10904 of 2012
                     ======================================================
                     1. Sachida Nand Sharma @ Sachu Singh Son Of Late Ram Bhajan Singh
                     Resident Of Village - Alipur Jagjiram Now Sahar Rampur, P.S. Naubatpur,
                     District - Patna
                     2. Shyaml Prasad Singh Son Of Late Ram Bhajan Singh Resident Of
                     Village - Alipur Jagjiram Now Sahar Rampur, P.S. Naubatpur, District -
                     Patna
                     3. Shailendra Kumar Singh Son Of Brij Kumar Singh Resident Of Village -
                     Alipur Jagjiram Now Sahar Rampur, P.S. Naubatpur, District - Patna

                                                                        .... ....   Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                     1. The State Of Bihar Through Chairman, District Board, Collectorat
                     Compound, Patna
                     2. The Deputy Development Commissioner (DDC) District Board,
                     Collectorate Compound, Patna
                     3. The District Magistrate , Patna
                     4. The Circle Officer (Anchaldhikari), Naubatpur, Patna

                                                                      .... .... Respondent/s

                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR
                     MANDAL
                     ORAL ORDER

3       06-10-2015

Despite repeated calls no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application.

Counsel for the State is present. He points out that the case was earlier dismissed for non prosecution on 11.04.2013.

In view of aforesaid, again the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/-

U