Patna High Court - Orders
Sanjeev Kumar Mishra vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna on 16 December, 2019
Bench: Chief Justice, Anil Kumar Upadhyay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25154 of 2019
======================================================
Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Son of Sri Manik Prasad Mishra, Resident of
Jyotipuram Colony, Khajpura, P.O. B.V. College P.S.- Rajiv Nagar Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The High Court of Judicature at Patna through its Registrar General Patna
High Court, Patna.
2. The Registrar General High Court of Judicature at Patna Patna High Court,
Patna.
3. The Registrar (List) Patna High Court, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra (In Person)
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 16-12-2019Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
" (i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No.3 to recall the order published in daily cause list of Patna High Court dated 13.11.2019 issued under the signature of the Respondent No.3 by the order of Hon'ble the Chief Justice by which all the mentioning for out of turn posting of the case shall be mentioned only before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, Patna High Court, contrary to the provisions of Patna High Court Rules.
Patna High Court CWJC No.25154 of 2019(2) dt.16-12-2019 2/2
(ii) Any other order or orders as to Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." In view of the law laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court in State of Rajasthan versus Prakash Chand and others, (1998) 1 SCC 1; Kamini Jaiswal verus Union of India & another, (2018) 1 SCC 156; and Shanti Bhushan versus Supreme Court of India through its Registrar and another, (2018) 8 SCC 396, we do not find any illegality in the order or merit in the present petition.
Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/-
U