Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Madhubindu Jayshanker Vyas vs State Of Gujarat & on 28 March, 2014

Author: Ks Jhaveri

Bench: Ks Jhaveri, A.G.Uraizee

         C/LPA/139/2007                                          ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

              LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 139 of 2007

          In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9247 of 1999
                                     With
              LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 129 of 2007
                                      In
            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9247 of 1999
================================================================
            MADHUBINDU JAYSHANKER VYAS....Appellant(s)
                            Versus
              STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR BM MANGUKIYA, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR VH KANARA, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
================================================================

        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
               and
               HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
                     Date : 28/03/2014
                               ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI) On 27.03.2014, this Court has passed following order:­ "This matter is being adjourned from time to time. Last time,  Mr. N.D. Nanavaty has assured that he will proceed with the  matter   today.   Today,   Mr.   B.M.   Mangukiya   has   filed   sick­ Note. We disapprove this conduct on the part of the learned  counsel for the parties. As a last chance S.O. to 28.03.2014.  On the next date, the matter will be taken up peremptorily  Page 1 of 2 C/LPA/139/2007 ORDER and   if   either   of   the   parties   has   any   difficulty,   alternative  arrangement will have to be made failing which the matter  will   be   proceeded   ex   parte.   Office   is   directed   to   list   this  matter below the admission matters as a first case."

Even today, an endeavour is made on behalf of learned advocate  for the appellant not to conduct the matter. Therefore, these appeals  are dismissed for default. 

(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) (A.G.URAIZEE,J) pawan Page 2 of 2