Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Amanpreet Singh vs State Of Punjab on 22 September, 2017

Author: Jaishree Thakur

Bench: Jaishree Thakur

Crl. Misc. M-35787-2017                                                      -1-



    IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
                HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                          Crl. Misc. M-35787 of 2017 (O&M)
                                          Date of Decision: September 22, 2017

Amanpreet Singh

                                                                   ...Petitioner

                                        Versus

State of Punjab

                                                                 ...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:-    Mr. Ashok Paul Batra, Advocate
             for the petitioner.

             Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG Punjab.

                                    ********

JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (Oral)

The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular/interim bail to the petitioner in FIR No.127 dated 17.09.2015, under Sections 363, 366, 376-D, 120-B, 328 of Indian Penal Code, Sections 4, 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 3, 4 of SC & ST Act, registered at Police Station Kharar, District SAS Nagar (Mohali).

In brief, the facts of the case are that the aforesaid FIR came be registered on the statement of Gurmeet Singh that petitioner Amanpreet Singh son of Avtar Singh and Tinka son of Lakhvir Singh had committed a wrong done with his daughter. Pursuant to the FIR, the petitioner was arrested and investigation was done. His bail application has been dismissed, on account of the fact that he is facing trial for the commission of 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 27-09-2017 03:59:23 ::: Crl. Misc. M-35787-2017 -2- offence of gang rape of the prosecutrix, who is a minor.

The only plea made at the present moment seeking grant of regular/interim bail is to attend the marriage of his brother, which is fixed for 27.09.2017.

I have heard counsel for the petitioner and this court is not inclined to grant him the relief, as sought. The petitioner herein is facing trial for a heinous crime that has been committed i.e. being involved in the crime of gang rape of a minor. The wedding ceremony of his brother has been fixed for 27.09.2017 and the petitioner being brother is not required to participate in any of the religious ceremony, to warrant grant of regular/interim bail.

There is no infirmity in the order that has been passed. The petition in hand stands dismissed.




                                                (JAISHREE THAKUR)
September 22, 2017                                    JUDGE
vijay saini




Whether speaking/reasoned                              Yes/No
Whether reportable                                     Yes/No




                                 2 of 2
              ::: Downloaded on - 27-09-2017 03:59:24 :::