Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gauhati High Court

Hemalata Baishya vs The State Of Assam 4 Ors on 31 August, 2020

Author: Achintya Malla Bujor Barua

Bench: Achintya Malla Bujor Barua

                                                               Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010111652020




                     THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                        Case No. : WP(C) 3281/2020

         1:HEMALATA BAISHYA
         W/O SRI DINESH PATGIRI
         PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHAMDHAMA, PO NIZ
         DHAMDHAMA, PS GHAGRAPAR, DIST NALBARI, ASSAM 781349

         VERSUS

         1:THE STATE OF ASSAM 4 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
         GOVERRNMENT OF ASSAM, HANDLOOM TEXTILES AND SERICULTURE
         DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF ASSAM,DISPUR, ASSAM ,SECRETARIAT
         ,GUWAHATI 6

         2:THE DIRECTOR
          HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES ASSAM
         AAMABARI GUWAHATI 1

         3:THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
          HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES DARRANG
          MANGALDAI
         ASSAM 784125

         4:THE SUPERINTENDENT
          HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES
          HANDLOOM PRODUCTION CENTRE(HPC) DHAMDHAMA
          NALBARI
         ASSAM 781349

         5:SHRI DHIREN DEKA
          DEMONSTRATOR
          HANDLOOM TRAINING CENTRE
          SONOWA
          UNDER THE ASSTT
          DIRECTOR
                                                                                                               Page No.# 2/3

                HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES
                DARRANG
                MANGALDAI
                781349
                RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS
                VILLAND POO CHANDKUCHI
                PS NALBARI
                ASSAM 78133

Advocate for the Petitioner            : MR. S SARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : MR R DHAR




                                     BEFORE
                HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

                                                          ORDER

Date : 31-08-2020 Heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned standing counsel for the Handloom and Textiles Department of the Govt. of Assam.

The petitioner Smti. Hemalata Baishya who was serving as a Demonstrator at HPC Dhamdhama under the Office of the Superintendent of Handloom & Textile HPC Dhamdhama was transferred and posted at HTC Dhamdhama under the Office of the Assistant Director, Handlood & Textile, Darrang, Mangaldai and in her place Shri Dhiren Deka was transferred.

The said order of transfer has been assailed in this petition on the ground of it having been passed in violation of the Office Memorandum dated 06.08.2013. It has been pointed out that as per the Office Memorandum the government officials i.e. officers and staffs are normally to be transferred only upon completion of three years of service at a particular place posting. But in respect of officers, there is an exception that they may be transferred before completion of the three years, but it has to be done with proper justification and ground and after obtaining the approval of the Chief Minister.

Subsequently, as regards officers, it was modified and provided that if an officer is transferred before completing two years, the requirement of proper justification and approval of the Chief Minister would be required.

Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel urges upon the ground that the petitioner is a staff and not an officer and therefore, the provision as regards effecting a transfer before completing a tenure of two years or three years at a given place by giving proper justification and obtaining approval of the Chief Minister would not be applicable and in fact she cannot be transferred prior completing three years at a particular place.

We are convinced that the contention raised requires an examination and therefore, a prima facie case may have been made out for an interim order.

Page No.# 3/3 But Mr. R. Dhar, learned standing counsel for the Handloom and Textile Department points out that the order of transfer is dated 18.06.2020 and in the meantime the other person Shri Dhiren Deka has already joined in the transfered place of posting.

Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel responds to the said contention by the stating that the petitioner immediately after the order of transfer had went on leave for two months and after completing the leave period has now approached the Court.

The intervening conduct of the petitioner in not approaching the Court at the earliest and instead going on leave for two months had caused the balance of convenience to be against her as well as irreparable loss would be done to the other person Shri Dhiren Deka if we now stay the order of transfer.

Accordingly, the interim prayer for staying the order of transfer dated 18.06.2020 stands rejected.

Issue notice, returnable on 08.10.2020. Extra copies to the learned counsel within seven days.

Steps on the respondent No.5 by registered post within seven days.

List on 08.10.2020.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant