Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Delhi High Court - Orders

M/S Sant Sandesh Media And ... vs Income Tax Officer Ward 22(3) Delhi And ... on 18 February, 2022

Author: Manmohan

Bench: Manmohan, Navin Chawla

                          $~37, 54, 57, 58 & 59
                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +     W.P.(C) 3038/2022
                                M/S SANT SANDESH MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION PVT.
                                LTD.                                              ..... Petitioner
                                                Through: Mr.Rishab Singla & Mr. Pawan Shree
                                                          Agrawal, Advs.
                                                versus
                                INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 22(3) DELHI AND ANR
                                                                             ..... Respondents
                                                Through: Mr.Sunil Agarwal, Sr. Standing
                                                          Counsel with Mr.Tushar Gupta, Jr.
                                                          Standing Counsel & Mr.Samarth
                                                          Chaudhari, Adv.
                          $~54
                          +     W.P.(C) 3070/2022
                                CONCEPT INFRADEVELOPERS PVT LTD                   ..... Petitioner
                                                Through: Mr.Rajeev Sharma & Mr.Aditya
                                                          Sharma, Advs.
                                                versus
                                INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX
                                OFFICER WARD -6 (1), DELHI AND ANR.         ..... Respondents
                                                Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Standing
                                                          Counsel with Ms.Easha Kadiyan, Jr.
                                                          Standing Counsel.
                          $~57
                          +     W.P.(C) 3074/2022
                                ABHISHEK AGGARWAL                                ..... Petitioner
                                                Through: Mr.P Roychaudhuri, Adv.
                                                versus
                                ITO WARD 54 (1), DELHI & ANR.                ..... Respondents
                                                Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Standing
                                                          Counsel with Ms.Easha Kadiyan, Jr.
                                                          Standing Counsel.
                          $~58
                          +     W.P.(C) 3080/2022
                                DEEPAK AGGARWAL                                  ..... Petitioner
                                                Through: Mr.P Roychaudhuri, Adv.


Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:KRISHNA BHOJ
Signing Date:21.02.2022
20:51:19
                                                versus
                                ITO WARD 54(1), DELHI & ANR.                ..... Respondent
                                               Through: Mr.Kunal Sharma, Sr. Standing
                                                         Counsel with Ms.Zehra Khan, Jr.
                                                         Standing Counsel & Mr.Shubhendu
                                                         Bhattacharyya, Adv.
                          $~59
                          +    W.P.(C) 3081/2022
                               DEEPAK AGGARWAL                                 ..... Petitioner
                                               Through: Mr.P Roychaudhuri, Adv.
                                               versus
                               ITO WARD 54 1, DELHI & ANR.                  ..... Respondents
                                               Through: Mr.Kunal Sharma, Sr. Standing
                                                          Counsel with Ms.Zehra Khan, Jr.
                                                          Standing Counsel & Mr.Shubhendu
                                                          Bhattacharyya, Adv.
                               CORAM:
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
                                               ORDER

% 18.02.2022 CM APPL. 8823/2022 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 3038/2022 CM APPL. 8882/2022 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 3070/2022 CM APPL. 8888/2022 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 3074/2022 CM APPL. 8924/2022 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 3080/2022 CM APPL. 8928/2022 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 3081/2022 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 3038/2022 & CM APPL. 8822/2022 W.P.(C) 3070/2022 & CM APPL. 8881/2022 W.P.(C) 3074/2022 & CM APPL. 8887/2022 W.P.(C) 3080/2022 & CM APPL. 8923/2022 W.P.(C) 3081/2022 & CM APPL. 8927/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners state that though the impugned notices in the present matters are dated 31st March, 2021, yet the same have Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KRISHNA BHOJ Signing Date:21.02.2022 20:51:19 been issued on or after 1st April, 2021. The said contention is disputed by learned counsel for the revenue.

Issue notice. Mr.Sunil Agarwal, Advocate, Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate and Mr.Kunal Sharma, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondents. They pray for and are permitted to file their counter affidavits within three weeks. Rejoinder affidavits, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing.

List on 14th March, 2022 along with connected matters.

MANMOHAN, J NAVIN CHAWLA, J FEBRUARY 18, 2022/rv Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KRISHNA BHOJ Signing Date:21.02.2022 20:51:19