Jharkhand High Court
Sarfaraj Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand ...... Opposite ... on 24 July, 2021
Author: Kailash Prasad Deo
Bench: Kailash Prasad Deo
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
[CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION]
B.A. No. 6512 of 2021
Sarfaraj Ansari ...... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ...... Opposite Party
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO (Through : Video Conference)
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P.
-----
02/Dated: 24/07/2021:
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though there are some defect(s) in the bail application as pointed out by the stamp reporter, but he undertakes to remove the defects within 30 days after the physical court starts and prayed that bail application may be heard as it is a regular bail application of the petitioner, who is in custody.
Considering the same, this Court is inclined to hear the bail application on merit but with condition that petitioner shall remove the defect(s) within 30 days after the physical court starts.
Joint Registrar (Judicial) is directed to ensure the compliance of this order. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has prayed for grant of regular bail in connection with Jamtara (Cyber) Crime P.S. Case No.15 of 2021, for the offence registered under Sections 414, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC and under Sections 66B, 66C, 66D of the I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that though from the possession of the petitioner, VIVO Android Mobile Set having IMEI No.86710 20490 48511 and 86710 20490 48503 fitted with JIO SIM No.62077 64788 and Idea SIM No.75178 56146 and Idea SIM No.83469 87314 (Serial No.89911 10000 14261 01316) and Vodaphone SIM Serial No.89913 01804 79385 4434 kept behind the cover were seized, but nothing incriminating has been recovered from him to connect the same with any transfer of money. Learned Spl. P.P. for the State seeks some time to file a detail counter- affidavit.
Considering the same, State counsel is directed to file counter-affidavit within a period of four weeks with regard to material collected during -2- investigation, recovery made from the possession or house of the petitioner. If any material connected with regard to cheating, regarding statement of the victim or transfer of money in the account of the petitioner or his relative or any OTP to their mobile is found, the same shall be filed before this Court along with criminal antecedent report of the petitioner. Put up this case after four weeks.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.) Sandeep/R.S