Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Gujarat High Court

Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd vs The Joint C.I.T. (Asstt.) on 18 March, 2014

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, Sonia Gokani

        O/TAXAP/170/2002                             ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       TAX APPEAL NO. 170 of 2002

================================================================
         GUJARAT ALKALIES & CHEMICALS LTD.....Appellant(s)
                               Versus
              THE JOINT C.I.T. (ASSTT.),....Opponent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR JP SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR KM PARIKH, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1
================================================================

      CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL
             KURESHI
             and
             HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA
             GOKANI

                            Date : 18/03/2014


                             ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. The appeal was admitted for consideration of the  following substantial question of law :

"Whether   on   the   facts   and   in   the   circumstances   of   the   case,   the   Appellate   Tribunal   has   substantially   erred   in   law   in   holding  that  excise  duty  and  sales  tax are   to be included in quantifying total turnover   for   the   purposes   of   computation   of   special   deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act ?" Page 1 of 2
O/TAXAP/170/2002 ORDER
2. Counsel   for   the   appellant   pointed   out   that   the  sole question arising in this appeal is covered  by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case  of  CIT   v.   Lakshmi   Machine   Works,   reported   in   (2007)   290   ITR   667   (S.C.).  The decision of the  Tribunal,   which   has   held   otherwise,   must   be  reversed to that extent.
3. Resultantly,   the   Tax   Appeal   is   allowed.   The  judgment of the Tribunal to the above extent is  reversed.   Tax   Appeal   stands   disposed   of.   There  shall be, however, no order as to costs.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) Aakar Page 2 of 2