Karnataka High Court
Smt Jayamma vs State Of Karnataka Represented on 18 January, 2013
Author: Dilip B.Bhosale
Bench: Dilip B Bhosale
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE
W.P.NO.30169/2012(GM/RC)
BETWEEN
SMT JAYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
W/O CHANNAGANGAIAH
EX-GRAM PANCHAYAT PRESIDENT
R/O SITAKAL, URDAGERE HOBLI
TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT-572 101.
... PETITIONER
(By Sri. S B MUKKANNAPPA, ADV.,)
AND
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE - 1
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
M S BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-1
2
3. THE COMMISSIONER
HINDU CHARITABLE INSTITUTION & ENDOWMENT
A V ROAD, CHAMARAJPET
BANGALORE-10
4. THE DY. COMMISSIONER
TUMKUR DISTRICT
TUMKUR-572 101
5. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER
TUMKUR SUB DIVISION
TUMKUR - 572 101
6. G K SIDDEOGWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O GANGAPPA
PRESIDENT, SRI BYLANJANEYA TEMPLE
KADUGUJJANAHALLI VILLAGE
URDUGERE HOBLI
TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT-572 101
7. K P HANUMANTHARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O PUTTANARASAIAH (LATE)
SECRETARY
SRI BYLANJANEYA SWAMY SEVA SAMITHY
KADUGUJJANAHALLI VILLAGE
URDUGERE HOBLI
TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT-572 101
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri. E.S.INDIRESH, HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-5) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 TO R5 TO CONSIDER THE WRITTEN REPRESENTATION DT.30.6.12 OF THE PETIITONER AT ANN-O TO TAKE POSSESSION OF 3 SRI.ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE SITUATED IN THE GOVT. LAND AT SY.NO.27, 28 OF KADUGUJJANAHALLI VILLAGE, URDUGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TQ. & DIST. & CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE IT AS MUJARAI TEMPLE BY ISSUING NECESSARY NOTIFICATION UNDER KARNATAKA HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT ACT 1997 IN INTEREST OF PUBLIC UNDER THE FACTS & CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRLY. HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
PC:
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to make fresh representation to the 3rd respondent-Commissioner seeking declaration under Section 42 of the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institution & Charitable Endowment Act, 1997 (for short 'the Act') in respect of Sri Anjaneya Swamy Temple. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
It is needless to mention that, if the petitioner makes a representation, as aforementioned, within a period of four weeks from today, the concerned authority shall 4 consider and decide it on merits in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks therefrom.
I hope and trust that the concerned authority shall issue notice to respondents-6 and 7 before passing any order on the application that will be filed by the petitioner under Section 42 of the Act.
Sd/-
JUDGE TL