Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Mr Santosh Prasad Mohanty vs 1 M S Sbc Infra Projects Pvt Ltd on 17 August, 2022

   BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
           REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
                         EA No.39/2014
                                  IN
                         CC.NO.19/2013


Between:
Mr. Santosh Prasad Mohanty
S/o.Sri Khetra Mohan Mohanty
Aged: 32 yrs; Occ: Software Engineer,
R/o.Flat No.106, Block-B,
Pristine Place Apartments,
Gajularamaram Village,
Qutubullapur Mandal, Rangareddy District,
(Rep. by wife Mrs.Bindushree Patnaik)

                                     Decree holder/Complainant
AND
1.

M/s.SBC Infra Projects India Pvt.Ltd.,(Developer) D.No.8-2-269/S/103, Plot No.103, Sagar Housing Society, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 34, Rep. by its Managing Director Mr.N.Ajay Babu.

2. Mr.N.Ajay Babu/Developer S/o.N.Kutumba Rao, Age: 46 years, Occ: Business, R/o.Flat No.301, Plot No.97, Meenakshi Side Apartment, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad - 73.

3. Mr.T.Murali Krishna Reddy (GPA &Vendor) S/o.Late Koti Reddy, Age: 50 yrs, Occ: Business, R/o.321-A-26, Road No.25, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 033.

4. Mr.K.R.K.Reddy/Vendor S/o.Late Mr.K.Veera Recddy, Age: 50 years, Occ: Busiuess, R/o.Plot No.24, Maruthi Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad 45.

Judgment Debtor/Opposite Parties Counsel for Decree holder/Complainant M/s. Aditya Sai Deshmukh Counsel for Judgment Debtor/Opp.Parties: M/s.M. Siva Sankar Reddy-R3 Mr.A.Raghavaiah- R4 Notice served-R2 QUORUM 8RI JU8TICIO M.8.K.JAIWAL, HON'BLE PRICNIDIENT HON'BLe SMT. MICIENA RAMANATHAN, LADY MICMBICR WIEDNICsDAY, THC BIEVIEN'TICICNTH DAY OF AUGUSTr TWO THOUSAND TWIENTY TWO Order . This applicution ia filecd U/8.27 of Consumer Protcction Acl, 1986, praying this Commission lo puninh the Judgnent Debtora/0pposito Partios U/w.25 & 27 of the C.P.Act to cnforce the compliance of the orler of thin Commission pumned on 16.12.2013.

2. On behalf of the Petitioner/Complainant, it is submitted that since the sale deed is cxccuted, the procccding is terminated. Hence, cxccution procecdings arc terminatc.