Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Ramakrishnan vs The State Through on 20 August, 2018

Author: N.Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

DATED: 20.08.2018  

CORAM   

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH              

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6316 of 2018 

1.Ramakrishnan  
2.Ravindran
3.Ranjith
4.Ramya  
5.Usha 
6.Ranjitha
7.Pappa 
8.Raja
9.Muniyan                                                    : Petitioners

Vs.

1.The State through
   The Sub-Inspector of Police,
   Ramanathapuram Town Police Station,  
   Ramnad District.
   [Crime No.47 of 2018].

2.Mangaleshwari                                     : Respondents        

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to
call for the records relating to the impugned F.I.R in Crime No.47 of 2018 on
the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

!For Petitioners          : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi
^For R-1                  : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi
                                            Government Advocate[Crl. side]

                For R-2           : Mr.V.Thisai Indiran      

        
:ORDER  

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.47 of 2018, on the file of the first respondent police, for an alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 324, 323, 506(ii) and 307 of IPC and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002.

2. The case is still in the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.

3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The parties were also present before the Court and they were identified by Ms.S.Lakshmi, SI of Police and they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card which are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the First Information Report in Crime No.47 of 2018.

5. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the First Information Report in Crime No.47 of 2018, on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed and the terms of Joint Compromise Memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Each of the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.300/- [Rupees Three Hundred only] as costs, to the credit of the ?Environment Fund? (payable in Account No.6656485009, Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Committee), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.

To

1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram Town Police Station, Ramnad District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

.