Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Shajida Banu vs University Of Calicut on 7 June, 2012

Author: T.R.Ramachandran Nair

Bench: T.R.Ramachandran Nair

       

  

  

 
 
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                              PRESENT:

                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

                   THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/17TH JYAISHTA 1934

                                  WP(C).No. 13162 of 2012 (U)
                                 ------------------------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
----------------------

          1. SHAJIDA BANU, AGED 23 YEARS
              SHAJI MANZIL, CHOOLAPADAM
              SHARADA MANDIRAM P.O., KOLATHARA,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

          2. JAGAEESH M.P. AGED 22, PADINHATTAYIL HOUSE
              RAMANATTUKARA P.O.KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

          3. REHANA N.R., AGED 22, NANATTIL HOUSE, NADIPULAM P.O.
             TRISSUR DISTRICT.

          4. NABEEL AHAMMED, AGED 22, MELETHIL HOUSE
              PERINTHALMANNA P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

          5. ARIF A.M., AGED 19, KOCHUTHONDHIL HOUSE
              KAKKAKKUNNU P.O .KOLLAM DISTRICT.

          6. BABITHA K., AGED 21, PANICHAKATHIL HOUSE,
              NIRAMARATHUR P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

          7. SHIBIN KRISHNA KUNIYIL
              KUNIYIL HOUSE, POYILOOR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT.

          8. AKHIL RAHMAN, AGED 22, NALUKANDATHIL HOUSE,
              EDAKKARA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

          9. ARUNLAL, AGED 24, ANANDAM HOUSE,
              MATHARATHOOR P.O.VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

          10. MOHAMMED SHAFAF, AGED 26, THAYYIL HOUSE, NADIYIRUPPU P.O.
                KONDOTTY,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

             BY ADVS.SRI.S.K.SAJU
                       SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYANAN
                       SMT.A.SIMI
                       SMT.VIDYA V.DEVAN

tss

W.P.(C)13162/2012


RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------

          1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT
              REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR
              CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM
              MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635.

          2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS
              UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.
              THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635.

             BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC,CALICUTY UNIVERSITY

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
            07-06-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:




tss

W.P.(C) NO.13162/2012

                              APPENDIX




PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS


P1a:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
1ST PETITIONER.

P1b:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
2ND PETITIONER.

P1c:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
3RD PETITIONER.

P1d:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
4TH PETITIONER.

P1e:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
5TH PETITIONER.

P1f:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
6TH PETITIONER.

P1g:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
7TH PETITIONER.

P1h:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
8TH PETITIONER.

P1i:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
9TH PETITIONER.

P1J:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY SUBMITTED BY THE
10TH PETITIONER.


RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS

             NIL

                                                 //TRUE COPY//


                                                 P.A. TO JUDGE


tss



                T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
              ---------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No.13162 OF 2012
               ---------------------------------------
             Dated this the 7th day of June, 2012.


                         J U D G M E N T

All that the petitioners seek is for a direction to the University to conduct revaluation and communicate the results to the petitioners who were studying for B.P.T/PG course within a specified period.

2. Learned Standing Counsel for the University submitted that the process of revaluation is going on.

There will be a direction to the University to revalue the answer papers of the petitioners covered by Ext.P1 series and inform the results to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp