Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Kuldip Singh Sandhu vs Chief Admin.,Haryana Urban ... on 8 July, 2014

      ITEM NO.22                                      COURT NO.12                                  SECTION IV
B

                                       S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                         I N D I A
                                               RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

      Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 31271/2008
      (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/09/2008
      in RSA No. 350/2008 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At
      Chandigarh)

      KULDIP SINGH SANDHU                                                                          Petitioner
(s)
                                      VERSUS
      CHIEF ADMIN.,HARYANA URBAN DEV.AUTH.& ANR.                                                  Respondent(
s)
      (FOR FINAL DISPOSAL)

      Date : 08/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.

      CORAM :
                                   HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
                                   HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL

      For Petitioner(s)                               Mr.     J. C. Gupta, Sr. Adv.
                                                      Mr.     Vishal Yadav, Adv.
                                                      Mr.     Rupinder Sheroen, Adv.
                                                      Mr.     Aman Pal, Adv.
                                                      Ms.     Priya Janghu, Adv.
                                                      Mr.     D. Mahesh Babu, Adv.

      For Respondent(s)                               Mr.     Govind Goel, Adv.
                                                      Dr.     Kailash Chand, Adv.
                                                      Mr.     Sanjay Kr. Yadav, Adv.
                                                      Mr.     Ankit Goel, Adv.

                                  UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                        O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the relevant material.


                                       We    do   not       find   any       legal        and     valid   gro
und    for

                            interference.         The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. If

                            the    Booth     in   question         is      put       up   for     fresh    sa
le,    the

                            petitioner       undoubtedly           would      be     entitled       to    par
ticipate

Signature Not Verified
                            therein.
Digitally signed by
Vinod Lakhina
Date: 2014.07.09
18:01:04 IST
Reason:


                                   [VINOD LAKHINA]                                         [SNEH LATA SHARM
A]
                                       COURT MASTER                                             COURT MASTER