Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

Shirish Mody Enterprises Llp, Mumbai vs Acit, Circle 21 (3), Mumbai on 14 October, 2021

                   THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                           "SMC" Bench, Mumbai
                          Shri Shamim Yahya (AM)

            I.T.A. No. 2282/Mum/2019 (Assessment Year 2014-15)

        Shirish Mody Enterprises LLP Vs. ACIT, Circle-21(3)
        83, B&C, Sheth Govindrao         2 n d Floor
        Smriti, Dr. Annie Besant Road    Piramal Chambers
        Worli, Mumbai-400 018.           Lalbaug, Parel
                                         Mumbai-400 012.
        PAN : ACJFS6961P
        (Appellant)                      (Respondent)

                Assessee by                  None
                Department by                Ms. Smita Verma
                Date of Hearing              14.10.2021
                Date of Pronouncement        14.10.2021

                                     ORDER

This appeal by the assessee is directed against order of learned CIT-A dated 27.2.2019 pertaining to assessment year 2014-15.

2. The grounds of appeal read as under :-

"1.1. The learned CIT (A) has erred in upholding the additions made by the AO on the grounds that the appellant has failed to comply with the provisions of section 47(xiiib) and as a result, the benefit under section 49(l)(e) read with explanation l(b) of section 2(42A) cannot be granted to the appellant with regards to the period of holding in respect of long term capital assets.
1.2. She has also erred in not appreciating the facts placed on record evidencing that the appellant has duly complied with all the conditions stipulated in proviso to section 47(xiiib)."

3. At the outset it is noted that the assessee has made an application that he shall be withdrawing the appeal. Learned departmental representative did not have any objection to this proposition. 2

Sh i r is h M o d y E n te r p r is e s L L P

4. Up on careful consideration I have granted permission to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Pronounced in the open court on 14.10.2021.

Sd/-

(SHAMIM YAHYA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated : 14/10/2021 Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent
3. The CIT(A)
4. CIT
5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6. Guard File.

BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Assistant Registrar) PS ITAT, Mumbai