Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Gopal vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 April, 2022

Author: D.Krishnakumar

Bench: D.Krishnakumar

                                                                              W.P.No.7500 of 2022

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 12.04.2022

                                                    CORAM:

                                  THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

                                                W.P.No.7500 of 2022

                  R.Gopal                                                ...Petitioner

                                                        vs.

                  1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                    Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
                    Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department,
                    Now re designated as Human Resources Management Department,
                    Secretariat,
                    Chennai – 600 009.

                  2.The Secretary to Government,
                    Labour and Employment Department,
                    Now re designated as Labour Welfare and Skilled Development
                    Department,
                    Secretariat,
                    Chennai – 600 009.                                  ...Respondents


                  Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                  praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to
                  conclude the disciplinary proceedings issued in Letter No.29054/Q/2008-3, P
                  & AR (Q) Department, dated 27.06.2008 and pass final orders on the same
                  within the stipulated time.



                  1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  W.P.No.7500 of 2022



                                        For Petitioner     : Mr.G.Elenchezhiyan

                                        For Respondents : Mr.M.Bindran
                                                          Additional Government Pleader



                                                         ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceedings issued in Letter No.29054/Q/2008-3, P & AR (Q) Department, dated 27.06.2008 and pass final orders on the same within the stipulated time.

2.The case of the petitioner in brief:

The petitioner was working as Under Secretary to Government and reached the age of superannuation on 30.06.2008 but he was not allowed to retire from service since a charge memo dated 27.06.2008 issued by the 1st respondent on him for the reason the petitioner had entered into Criminal conspiracy with the other office bearers and committed grave malpractices in the allotment of residential and public purpose plots under Okkiam Thoraipakkam Scheme and thereby gained unlawful pecuniary advantages constituting offences punishable under Section 120 – B of IPC, 13(1)(c)&(d) 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7500 of 2022 read with 13(2) and 15 of P.C. Act, 1988. Thereafter, the petitioner has submitted a detailed explanation on 04.07.2008 to the said charges, however, the first respondent has not concluded the disciplinary proceedings and thereby, the writ petitioner has also filed writ petition in W.P.No.17768 of 2008 and the same was dismissed by this Court on 30.07.2012. But thereafter also the respondent has not conducted any enquiry even after lapse of 10 years based on the charge memo till this day. Hence, the writ petition.

3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, still the respondents have not concluded the disciplinary proceedings after lapse of ten years.

4.Mr.M.Bindran, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents on instruction, would fairly submit that the said disciplinary proceedings will be concluded within the time as prescribed by this Court.

5.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials placed on record.

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7500 of 2022

6.In view of the aforesaid submissions and also considering the limited scope of prayer, without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court is inclined to direct the 1st respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceedings pertaining to the aforesaid charge memo dated 27.06.2008 in accordance with rules and pass final orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, the petitioner is also directed to co-operate with the enquiry.

7.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.


                                                                                         12.04.2022
                  Index           : Yes / No
                  Internet        : Yes / No
                  ata/dua

                  To

                  1.The Secretary,

Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Now re designated as Human Resources Management Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Secretary, Labour and Employment Department, Now re designated as Labour Welfare and Skilled Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7500 of 2022 D.KRISHNAKUMAR. J ata/dua W.P.No.7500 of 2022 12.04.2022 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis