Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Arvind Kejriwal vs Arun Jaitley . on 22 November, 2016

Bench: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Uday Umesh Lalit

     ITEM NO.34                                 COURT NO.7                       SECTION IIC

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8666/2016
     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/10/2016
     in CRLMC No. 2417/2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New
     Delhi)

     ARVIND KEJRIWAL                                                              Petitioner(s)

                                                        VERSUS

     ARUN JAITLEY AND ORS.                              Respondent(s)
     (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned
     judgment and interim relief and office report)

     Date : 22/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

     For Petitioner(s)                    Mr.   Ram Jethmalani, Sr. Adv.
                                          Mr.   Shadan Farasat,Adv.
                                          Mr.   Ashwath Sitaraman, Adv.
                                          Mr.   Vibhor Jain, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                    Mr.   Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.
                                          Mr.   Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.
                                          Mr.   Manick Dogra, Adv.
                                          Mr.   Manoj Taneja, Adv.
                                          Mr.   P. V. Yogeswaran,Adv.

                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

Heard Mr. Ram Jethmalani, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner at considerable length.

We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order.

The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

                           Consequent     upon    dismissal      of    the    special     leave
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by   petition, pending applications shall stand disposed of.
RAJNI MUKHI
Date: 2016.11.22
15:40:49 IST
Reason:




                          (RAJNI MUKHI)                               (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY)
                             Sr. P.A.                                      COURT MASTER