Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Chander Mohan Behl vs Narcotics Control Bureau, Chandigarh on 31 March, 2015

                       (122) CRM No. 10779 of 2015 in CRM-M No. 5506 of 2015                       -1-




                       Chander Mohan Behl Versus Narcotic Control Bureau, Chandigarh


                       Present:-      Mr. Tanu Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner.


                                      There is a request made for placing on record amended prayer

                       clause and request to correct the order dated 27.03.2015, as is decipherable

                       from the head-note of the application. However, body of the application

                       does not mention as to what was the mistake and why the substitution is

                       required to be made. Also, it is not mentioned that where the date is

                       mentioned as 31.01.2015, which is sought to be corrected.

                                      Counsel for the petitioner submits that due to her mistake the

                       application was not framed properly and in case of rejection of the same

                       calling upon for a fresh better application, the petitioner shall be the

                       sufferer as interim bail was allowed to him on 27.03.2015. However, on

                       account of the mistake in the main petition, he was not released by the jail

                       authorities.

                                      It is further submitted that the request in the application may be

                       treated as one for amendment of the head-note of the main petition and the

                       prayer clause for which purpose amended pages have been added along

                       with the present application.

                                      Regarding para No. 3 of the application, it is submitted that the

                       date referred in the said para is in relation to the order passed on 27.03.2015

                       where the date is typed as 31.01.2015 instead of 13.01.2015 as the

                       petitioner was arrested on 13.01.2015.

                                      Since liberty of the petitioner is involved, on oral request of

                       counsel for the petitioner explaining as to what is the request actually made
RAMESH KUMAR MALIK
2015.04.01

11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh (122) CRM No. 10779 of 2015 in CRM-M No. 5506 of 2015 -2- for, the application is allowed. Amended pages attached with the application be attached at the appropriate place substituting the pages already existing in the application.

Requisite correction in the order dated 27.03.2015 has also been made.

Disposed of accordingly.

(NAVITA SINGH) JUDGE 31.03.2015 Ramesh RAMESH KUMAR MALIK 2015.04.01 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh