Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Cholamandalam Investment And Finance ... vs Sekh Mujibar Rahaman & Ors on 14 June, 2018

Author: Soumen Sen

Bench: Soumen Sen

                                    ORDER SHEET
                                  EC No.214 of 2018
                          IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                           Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                                    ORIGINAL SIDE



         CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED
                                Versus
                     SEKH MUJIBAR RAHAMAN & ORS.



   BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN
  Date : 14th June, 2018.

                                                                              Appearance:
                                                           Ms. Shrayashee Das (Saha), Adv.
                                                                      Ms. Tulika Roy, Adv.


      The Court : Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the award-holder has relied

upon an unreported Division Bench judgment of this Court in GA No.922 of 2017, APOT

No.89 of 2017 and EC No.1285 of 2015 (Magma Fincorp Limited vs. Ashok Kumar &

Ors.) dated 13th September, 2017, where the Hon'ble Division Bench had considered the

aspect of service of award upon the judgment-debtor. In deciding the said application,

the Hon'ble Division Bench has referred to Clause 9(b) of the arbitration agreement

between the parties in the said proceeding, Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act,

Section 3 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and Chapter VI of the Indian Post Office

Act, 1898. Similar clause as that of 9(b) that was considered by the Hon'ble Division

Bench is present in the instant arbitration agreement.      The records reveal that the

envelopes said to contain the award was forwarded by the Arbitral Tribunal.           The

envelope was addressed to the respondents at the addresses mentioned in the

arbitration agreement and proper stamps were affixed thereon. The Arbitrator has also paid postal charges by affixing prepaid adhesive postage stamps and the postal article 2 duly put in by registered post in the manner provided in Chapter VI of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. The said award have been served on both the judgment-debtors as reflected by the acknowledgment due card annexed to the execution application. In view of the Hon'ble Division Bench judgment and having regard to the factual position as discussed above, in my view, the award-holder is able to demonstrate service of the award upon the judgment-debtors.

The judgment-debtors are directed to file their individual affidavits of assets in Form No.16A of Appendix-E of the Code of Civil Procedure within four weeks from the date of communication of the order, failing which warrants of arrest may be issued against the judgment-debtors.

The matter is made returnable on 3rd August, 2018 when the judgment-debtor no.1 shall be present for examination.

(SOUMEN SEN, J.) B.Pal