Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 6]

Chattisgarh High Court

Neeraj Kumar Tiwari vs Basant Kumar Pal And Ors. 3 Mac/976/2013 ... on 28 January, 2020

                            1

                                                      NAFR

    HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                 MAC No. 975 of 2013

 Neeraj Kumar Tiwari S/o S.K. Tiwari R/o Near Bus Stand,
  Dongargarh, P.S. Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon C.G.

                                               ---- Appellant

                         Versus

1. Basant Kumar Pal S/o Peelaram Pal Aged About 30 Years
  R/o Bundeli, P.S. & Tah. Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon
  C.G.

2. Anil Kumar Mallah S/o Mitthulal Mallah R/o Sharma Colony,
  Camp-2, P.S. Chhawni, Bhilai, Distt. Durg C.G.

3. Dilip Kumar S/o Khelan Prasad Aged About 37 Years R/o
  Vivekanand Nagar, Camp-2, Bhilai, Ward No. 24, Bhilai,
  P.S. Chhawni, Bhilai, Distt. Durg C.G.

                                           ---- Respondents

MAC No. 976 of 2013  Neeraj Kumar Tiwari S/o S.K. Tiwari R/o Near Bus Stand, Dongargarh, P.S. Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon C.G.

---- Appellant Versus

1. Santosh Kumar Pal S/o Bhaiyalal Pal Aged About 35 Years R/o Village-Bundeli, P.S. & Tah. Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon C.G.

2. Anil Kumar Mallah S/o Mitthulal Mallah R/o Sharma Colony, Camp-2, P.S. Chhawni, Bhilai, Distt. Durg C.G. 2

3. Dilip Kumar S/o Khelan Prasad Aged About 37 Years R/o Vivekanand Nagar, Camp-2, Bhilai, Ward No. 24, Bhilai, P.S. Chhawni, Bhilai, Distt. Durg C.G.

---- Respondents None for Appellant & Ms. Pusplata Khalko on behalf of Mr. Raghavendra Pradhan, Advocate for Respondent No.1 In MAC No.975/2013.

None for the parties in MAC No.976/2013.

Hon'ble Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, J Order On Board 28/01/2020

1. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellant even when the cases are called in the second round of hearing.

2. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss these appeals for want of prosecution.

3. Accordingly, the instant appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/-

(Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Ankit