Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mrlalit Mohan Kandpal vs Ministry Of Defence on 27 May, 2016

                       CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                     Club Building (Near Post Office)
                      Old JNU Campus,New Delhi­110067
                        Tel: +91­11­26106140/26179548

                                                        File No. 
                                         CIC/CC/A/2014/000665/SD
                                    Date of Decision: 27/05/2016
Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant                     :   Lalit Mohan Kandpal
                                  CQA (I), Rajpur
                                  Dehradun - 248008
Respondent                    :   Director & CPIO
                                  DGQA/PI Cell
                                  Room No. 139, G Block
                                  Nirman Bhawan
                                  DHQ PO New Delhi - 110011
RTI        application  :         Nil & 21/12/2013
filed on
PIO replied on          :         17/12/2013 &24/01/2014
First   appeal   filed  :         12/02/2014
on
First        Appellate  :         01/04/2014
Authority order
Second Appeal dated  :            09/09/2014

 
Information Commissioner               :       Shri Divya Prakash Sinha

Information sought

:

Appellant   in   his   RTI   dt.   Nil   has   asked   the   following  information from SQAE (A) Delhi Cantt:­ 1­ Does Swami hand book and swami FRSR books bought in SQAE  (A)   Delhi   Cantt.   and   who   is   authorised   to   buy   these  books, librarian or some other authorised by board?

2­ For   how   many   years   these   above   books   were   bought   in  SQAE(A) Raipur Dehradun?

3­ How much amount had been spent by SQAE(A) Raipur Dehradun  on purchase till date?

4­ How   many   officers   who   were   transferred   to   SQAE   Raipur  Dehradun have been paid interim period HRA? Give details. 5­ On   the   basis   of   reference   in   Swamy   FR   SR   Part   V   HRA   &  CCA, how many officers and staffs were benefitted? 6­ Under   which   rule   HRA   amount   Rs.   6864,   through   cheque  no.825284 dt. 16/04/2013 vide bill no. CG0102 was passed?

1

Not   being   satisfied   by   the   above   CPIO,   on   the   point   no.4  and   6,   he   further   asked   the   same   questions   from   CPIO  DGQA/PI cell, New Delhi.

Grounds for the Second Appeal:

The CPIO has not provided the desired information.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present:­ Appellant: Present on phone.
Respondent: Virendra Singh, APIO, CQA(I), Raipur, Dehradun and  Chandra Shekhar, CPIO DGQA HQ, New Delhi present in person.
Appellant   mentioned   that   in   the   JCM   -   4th  Level   meeting   of  26.8.2013, it was stated from the Govt. side that Swamy's Hand  Book   on   Govt   Rules   and   Orders   be   recognised   by   Govt. 

Departments.   He   also   submitted   that   he   had   requested   Rule  position on grant of HRA of Rs.6864 vide CQA(I) Bill no.CGO/02  dated 6.4.13. Appellant wanted a copy of the Rules governing  HRA   and   details   of   employees   who   have   furnished   the  undertaking stipulated in the Rules.

CPIO submitted that the Rule position regarding grant of HRA  has been clarified to the appellant on 20.1.2014 and 24.3.2014  that it is granted as per MoF OM. No. F2(37)­E­II(B)/64, dated  27   Nov   1965.   CPIO   also   mentioned   that   collating   the  information   about   employees   who   have   given   undertaking   will  disproportionately   divert   the   resources   of   the   Public  Authority.

Decision  Commission   is   of   the   opinion   that   Swamy's   Hand   Book   is  reference book for Govt. Departments on Circulars and Orders  issued from time to time by the Govt.  Submission of the CPIO  that collating information about all employees who have given  undertaking   as   required   by  MoF   OM.   No.   F2(37)­E­II(B)/64,  dated   27   Nov   1965  will    disproportionately   divert   the  resources   of   the   Public   Authority   is   accepted.     Commission  directs   the   CPIO   to   provide   the   copy   of   O.M.   No.   F2(37)­E­ II(B)/64, dated 27 Nov 1965 to the appellant within 15 days of  receipt of this order.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

2

(Divya  Prakash  Sinha) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy (Raghubir Singh) Dy. Registrar/Designated Officer 3