Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

Amar Singh Markam vs State Of Chhattisgarh 20 Wphc/25/2018 ... on 17 August, 2018

Author: P. Sam Koshy

Bench: P. Sam Koshy

                                                                                      NAFR
                          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
                                      W.P.S. NO. 5301 OF 2018
           Amar Singh Markam, S/o Lakhamoo Ram Markam, aged about 36 years,
           presently working as Lecturer Panchayat at Govt. Higher Secondary School,
           Randhana, Block Makdi, District Kondagaon (CG)              ... Petitioner
                                            versus
           1.     State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of
           Panchayat and Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya
           Raipur, District Raipur (CG)
           2.     Commissioner-cum-Director, Directorate of Panchayat, Naya Raipur,
           District Raipur (CG)
           3.     Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kondagaon, District
           Kondagaon (CG)                                           ... Respondents
           For Petitioner                           :     Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Advocate.
           For Respondents                          :     Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. A.G.

                                 Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
                                          Order on Board
      17/08/2018

1. Learned counsels appearing for the parties submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions, wherein allowing the petitions, the circular dated 23.4.2016 has been quashed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission, since the impugned order or action is based on circular dated 23.4.2016 which stands quashed in the case referred above, the present writ petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall also be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post.

3. The writ petition thus stands finally disposed of. Sd/-


                                                                        (P. Sam Koshy)
/sharad/                                                                   Judge