Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

The Indian Penal Code vs In Re : Nabab Ali @ Kanun on 1 May, 2023

Author: Debangsu Basak

Bench: Debangsu Basak

01.05.2023 25 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK REJECTED C.R.M.(A) 1837 of 2023 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanchal Police Station Case No. 308 of 2023 dated 17.03.2023 under Sections 354D/509/448/354C/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Nabab Ali @ Kanun ...... petitioner Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee Mr. Omar Faruk Gazi Mr. Dipankar Das ....for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Banerjee Ms. Purnima Ghosh ....for the State There is a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 suggesting that the petitioner took offensive photograph of the victim and sent the same to her husband.

The victim recorded her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) implicating the petitioner in the rape and outraging her modesty, amongst others.

The claims made by the victim in her 164 Cr.P.C. statement, apparently, are corroborated by the materials in the case diary, presently available.

In such circumstances, considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner in the incident, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected and the application being CRM (A) 1837 of 2023 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)