Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Biju S. Nair vs Union Of India on 10 September, 1998

       

  

  

 
 
                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                             PRESENT:

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM

            WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/8TH PHALGUNA 1934

                                     WP(C).No. 22336 of 2008 (H)
                                         ---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------

            BIJU S. NAIR, S/O. R. SASIDHARAN NAIR,
            VASANTI NAGAR, T.C. 79 -1364, KARRIKKAKOM,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 007.

            BY ADVS.SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH
                          SRI.K.JITHIN
                          SMT.V.J.SAFEENA
                          SRI.S.SANJITH


RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

        1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY
            SECRETRY FOR FOOD AND CONSUMER
            AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT.

        2. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA,
            REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, HEAD QUARTER,
            NEW DELHI-110 001.

        3. ZONAL MANAGER, ZONAL OFFICE,
            FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, CHENNAI.

        4. REGIONAL MANAGER,FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE,
            KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 695 004.

        5. DISTRICT MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF
            INDIA, DISTRICT OFFICE, VALIYATHURA
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 008.

             R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA
             R2 TO R5 BY SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE,SENIOR ADVOCATE
                      ADV. SRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J.

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
            ON 27-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
            THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C)NO.22336/2008

                               APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1     COPY OF THE AGENDA OF THE MEETING HEOD IN THE DISTRICT OFFICE, FOOD
       CORPORATION OF INDIA , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 10/9/1998

P2     COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 17/10/2000 ISSUED BY DISTRICT MANAGER,
       DESCRIBING THE PARTICULARS OF THE SERVICE OF R. SASIDHARAN NAIR

P3     COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION THROUGH A LETTER DATED 22/1/2002 TO THE
       HON'BLE MINISTER OF STATE FOR RAILWAY SENT BY PETITIONER.

P4     COPY OF THE FORWARDING LETTER DATED 27/7/2002 OF GEORGE KURIAN

P5     COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 30/7/2002 PRIVATE SECRETARY TO MINISTER TO
       GEORGE KURIAN

P6     COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20/10/2002 SENT BY PETITIONER TO
       THE SECRETARY,FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA EMPLOYEES UNION ALSO

P7     COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 30/9/2003 OF 3RD RESPONDENT.

P8     COPY OF THE LETTER AT 17.10.2003 SENT BY PETITIONER TO ZONAL
       MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA.

P8(A) COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION AT 20.10.03 OF 3RD RESPONDENT TO
       PETITIONER.

P9     COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.05.2006 SENT BY PETITIONER TO
       THE ZONAL MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA

P10    COPY OF THE LETTER AT 20.06.2006 SENT BY AREA MANAGER, THE FOOD
       CORPORATION OF INDIA TO THE PETITIONER.

P10(A) COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM AT 05.05.2003 ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY
       OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCE AND PENSIONS,DEPARTMENT OF
       PERSONNEL AND TRAINING

P11    COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11/7/2006 TO THE ZONAL MANAGER,
       ZONAL OFFICE,FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

P12    COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 08/04/2008 SENT BY DY.GENL.MANAGER
       (PER)/CAPIO FOR GEN.MANAGER(WZ) TO THE PETITIONER.

P13    COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 06/12/2007 SENT BY MANAGER(RTI),TO
       THE PETITIONER.

P13(A) COPY OF THE COMPASSINATE APPOINTMENTS MADE DURING 2004


sts                                                                  2/-

                              -2-

WP(C)NO.22336/2008


P14  COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16/4/2008 SENT BY PETITIONER TO 1ST
     RESPONDENT ALONG WITH POSTAL ORDERS

P15  COPY OF THE SANCTION ORDER BY WHICH RS.15,000/- WAS GRANTED DATED
     10/09/2008

P16  COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DECUCTING RS.59,726/- FROM RS.1,00,000/- AS
     GRATUITY DATED 21/10/2008

P17  COPY OF THE SALARY CERTIFICATE OF MY MOTHER DATED 30/04/99

P18  COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED UNDER EPF PENSION SCHEME DATED
     02/02/2001

P19  COPY OF THE SALARY SLIP OF MY MOTHER DATED 15/10/2003 SHOWING NET
     SALARY AND LIABILITIES

P20  COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE SHOWING THAT MY MOTHER IS A HEART
     PATIENT DATED 26/05/2000

P21  COPY OF THE PROMISSORY NOTE GIVEN BY MOTHER TO S.R.INDHU DATED
     26/03/02.


RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:        NIL




                                   /TRUE COPY/



                                   P.A.TO.JUDGE


sts



                   C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.

              -------------------------------------------------
               W.P.(c) No. 22336 OF 2008
              -------------------------------------------------
      DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013

                         J U D G M E N T

In this writ petition the petitioner is challenging Ext.P10 order issued by the 2nd respondent Corporation rejecting his claim for compassionate appointment under the DDE quota. The rejection is made on the ground that, appointments pending for more than 3 years cannot be considered, in accordance with the circular issued by the 2nd respondent on the basis of orders of the 1st respondent.

2. Petitioner has produced Ext.P22, a letter issued by the Area Manager of the 2nd respondent Corporation intimating that the Corporation has decided to re-open the applications for compassionate appointments, which were already rejected on the basis that the time limit had exceeded 3 years. In the said letter the petitioner was requested to produce certain documents if he is still interested in joining the Corporation. W.P.(c) No.22336/2008 -2-

3. Sri. P. Jacob Vargheese, learned Senior counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent Corporation submitted that, in view of the changed policy the application will be considered afresh and appropriate decision will be taken on the basis of eligibility.

4. Under the above mentioned circumstances, the writ petition is hereby closed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek appointment by producing requisite documents on the basis of Ext.P22 letter.

5. It is made clear that if the petitioner is aggrieved by any further decision which will be taken, he will be at liberty to challenge the same.

Sd/-

C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.

AMG True copy P.A to Judge