Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Khare vs Insurance Division on 28 November, 2011

                                            1



                      Central Information Commission
 Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                  Delhi­110066
              Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in


                      Appeal: No. CIC/DS/C/2010/000800 


 Appellant /Complainant          :       Shri Sanjay Kumar Khare, Mumbai   

Public Authority                 :       National Insurance Academy,Pune/
                                         Chennai ( Sh. R.Das, Sh. S.B. Jog, Sh. 
                                         Narsimha Rao, CPIO & Sh. Govind 
Rajan,
                                         AA - through videoconferencing)

Third Party                      :       Sh. A.K. Bhandari, CE & 4 others from 
G
                                         GIPSA - through videoconferencing) 

Date of Hearing                  :         28 November 2011   
Date of Decision                 :         28 November  2011


Facts:­ 

1. Appellant submitted  RTI application dated 16 July 2009 before the  CPIO, National Insurance Academy, Pune seeking information relating to  the marks and the ranking provided to him of the Promotion Examination  of GIPSA companies on 14.6.2009.

2. The  Commission vide  its  Order 20  December  2010 remitted  the  matter back to the CPIO in the case.

3. Being aggrieved and not being satisfied  by the  response of NIA  despite the above order of Commission the appellant preferred complaint  before the Commission  

4. Respondents   were   present   at   the   hearing   through  Videoconferencing. The third party, GIPSA was also present at the hearing  in person. 

5. The respondents submitted that they have filed Writ Petitions in two  similar   cases   at   Madras   High   Court   and   there   is   a   stay   against   the  Appeal: No. CIC/DS/C/2011/000800    2 Commission's   order     by   the   High   Court.   The   appellant   through   audio  conferencing   submits   that   there   is   no   stay   against   the   order   of   the  Commission. 

Decision notice

6. After   hearing   both   the   parties,   the   commission   directs   the  respondents to given affidavit as per their averments at the hearing and a  certified copy of the stay order to the appellant within one week of the  receipt   of   this   order   and   the   Commission   reserves  its   decision   till   the  matter is finally decided by the Madras High Court.

7. However, if , as claimed by the appellant, there is no stay granted  against the Commission's order, then the law as laid down by the Supreme  Court     in  Central   Board   of   Secondary   Education   &   Anr.   Vs   Aditya   Bandopadhyay   &   Ors   :   Civil   Appeal   No.   6454   of   2011  regarding  "Disclosure of Answer Sheets" will apply and the marks will have to be  disclosed to the Appellant. 

 (Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­
1.. Shri Sanjay Kumar Khare A­312, Adarsh CHS Spring Mills Compound, G.D. Ambedkar Marg, Dadar (East), Mumbai­400014
2. The CPIO Chief Administrator Appeal: No. CIC/DS/C/2011/000800    3 National Insurance Academy Balewadi,Baner Road, NIA P.O.,  Pune­411045 (Maharashtra)
3. The CPIO United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,  Head Office, United India 24, Whites Road, Chennai­600014 (Tamilnadu)
4. The Appellate Authority Chief Executive General Insurers'(Pub.Sec.)Assn of India 3rd. Floor (Rear Wing) Jeevan Vihar Building,  Parliament Street, New Delhi ­110001       Appeal: No. CIC/DS/C/2011/000800