Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Indian Institute Of Technology Madras vs The Controller Of Patents And Designs on 13 July, 2023

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

                                                                                   (T)CMA(PT)/95 /2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                    DATED: 13.07.2023
                                                         CORAM
                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
                                                    (T)CMA(PT)/95/2023
                                                    (OA/21/2017/PT/CH)

                     Indian Institute of Technology Madras
                     Rep. By its Dean,
                     IIT Post Office,
                     Chennai-600 036.                                            ... Appellant
                                                        -vs-

                     The Controller of Patents and Designs,
                     Patent Office
                     IPR Buildings,
                     GST Road, Guindy,
                     Chennai-600 032.                                            ... Respondent

                     PRAYER:         Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (Patents) filed under
                     Section 117-A of the Patents Act, 1970, prayed that (a) the Order in
                     POC/RECS/2/2016-17/P1029 dated 29.04.2016 passed by the Respondent
                     may be set aside and the Respondent may be directed to receive the
                     Appellant's renewal application dated 27.04.2016 for the Appellant's Patent
                     No.2007637 along with the renewal fee and renew the said Patent for the
                     year up to 2016.
                                    For Appellant       : Mr.D.Moses Jeyakaran
                                    For Respondent      : Mr.A.R.Sakthivel, CGSC
                                                       **********


                     1/2


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      (T)CMA(PT)/95 /2023




                                                           SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
                                                                                                     kal
                                                             ORDER

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has been instructed to withdraw the appeal. He has made an endorsement for the said purpose.

2. By taking note of the same, (T)CMA(PT)/95/2023 is dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs.

13.07.2023 kal Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No (T)CMA(PT)/95/2023 (OA/21/2017/PT/CH) 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis