Madras High Court
Rayarath Parkum Kuruman Kandiyal ... vs Kottekulath Kunhi Sankaran Adiodi on 14 July, 1916
Equivalent citations: 37IND. CAS.83, AIR 1918 MADRAS 998(1)
JUDGMENT
1. The second appeal is argued only on the plea of limitation. It is urged with reference to Seydarakath Kakkachi V. Valiarath Muhamad Kutti (1) that Article 110, not Article 116, of the Limitation Act is applicable. In that case, however, the question was of a tenant holding over after the expiration of an ordinary lease. Here it is of a kanomdar; and the kanom tenure, involving the taking of an account for the whole period of the kanomdar's occupation, is not, in our opinion, subject to the legal incidents of a lease in this respect.
2. The second appeal is dismissed with costs.