Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Niranjan Singh vs State Of U.P. on 27 May, 2020

Author: Siddharth

Bench: Siddharth





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?In Chamber
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12873 of 2020
 

 
Applicant :- Niranjan Singh
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd Haris Khan,Anand Prakash Pandey,Namman Raj Vanshi
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
 

In view of the guidelines laid down by this Court, the urgent bail applications have been directed to be heard through Video Conferencing.

Heard Sri Namman Raj Vanshi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri I.P. Srivastava, through Video Conferencing.

Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application This exemption application is allowed.

Order on Criminal Misc. Bail Application The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Niranjan Singh, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 603 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 406, 506 IPC, Police Station Khair, District- Aligarh, during pendency of trial.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant was only an intermediary, who introduced the informant to one Puran Sharma @ Tinku. The complainant issued a cheque of Rs.2,25,000/- in the name of Puran Sharma @ Tinku for the purpose of purchasing Maruti Car. No car was delivered nor the money was returned. Later Puran Sharma gave two cheques, which could not be encashed since the payment was stopped. It has been submitted that applicant introduced Puran Sharma to the complainant, but he turned dishonest. His role is different from Puran Sharma and therefore, he may be granted bail. He is in jail since 19.1.2020.

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.

Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
4. In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.
5. The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.
6. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
7. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

Order Date :- 27.5.2020 Ruchi Agrahari