Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Ambris Karad vs State Of Odisha .... Opp. Party on 11 May, 2022

Author: S.K. Sahoo

Bench: S.K. Sahoo

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                           ABLAPL No.975 of 2022

              Ambris Karad                        ....        Petitioner

                                   Mr. S.K. Jena, Advocate

                                       -versus-

              State of Odisha                     ....       Opp. Party

                                   Mr. A.K. Beura,
                                   Addl. Standing Counsel

                                    CORAM:
                               JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                                    ORDER

Order No. 11.05.2022

02. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

This is an application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with R.Udayagiri P.S. Case No. 154 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No.131 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Paralakhemundi for the commission of the alleged offences punishable under sections 20(b)(ii)(C), 25, and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Perused the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory bail application.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the involvement of the petitioner is based on the confessional // 2 // statement of the co-accused before the police and therefore, the anticipatory bail application may be favourably considered.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that it is a case of seizure of commercial quantity of ganja and in view of the bar under section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act, the petitioner is not entitled to be released on anticipatory bail.

In view of such submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, since commercial quantity of ganja has been seized and in view of the bar under section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act, while not inclining to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, liberty is granted to the petitioner to surrender and move for bail in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today in the event of which the learned Court below shall dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously. The case records shall be made available to the Court concerned for disposal of the bail application.

The ABLAPL stands disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge PKSahoo Page 2 of 2