Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Shinoj Shanker vs State Of Kerala

Author: P.Ubaid

Bench: P.Ubaid

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                        PRESENT:

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID

  TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/26TH KARTHIKA,
                          1937

                 Crl.MC.No. 7253 of 2015
                ------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2015 IN C.M.P NO.2914/2015
IN C.C NO.365/2014 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE
                   COURT, I, ATTINGAL

PETITIONER:
-----------

      SHINOJ SHANKER, AGED 23 YEARS,
      S/O.JAYASHANKAR, ABHAYAM VEEDU,
      KOCHALUMMOODU
      MUDAPURAM DESOM, KIZHUVILAM VILLAGE,
      THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

      BY ADV. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR

RESPONDENTS:
------------

    1. STATE OF KERALA
      REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
      HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM.

    2. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER
      PASSPORT OFFICE, SNSM BUILDING,
      KARALKADA JUNCTION,
      PETTAH PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 024.

      R2 BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR
                                           GENERAL
      R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SHEEBA M.T

        THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE     HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION   ON   17-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 7253 of 2015
-----------------------
                        APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
-----------------------

ANNX.A1 - COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.6.2015 IN CMP
NO.164/2015 IN CC NO.103/2015 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS
MAGISTRATE COURT II ATTINGAL.

ANNX.A2 - COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 3.7.2015 IN CMP
NO.2914/2015 IN CC NO.365/2014 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS
MAGISTRATE COURT I ATTINGAL.

ANNX.A3 - COPY OF COUNTER FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN
CMP NO.2914/2015 IN CC NO.365/2014 OF JUDICIAL FIRST
CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT I ATTINGAL.

ANNX.A4  -  COPY   OF  THE   ORDER  DATED   29.9.2015  IN
CRL.MC.NO.6385/2015 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNX.A5 - CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2015 IN
CMP NO.2914/2015 IN CC NO.365/2014 OF JUDICIAL FIRST
CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT I ATTINGAL.

ANNX.A6  -  COPY  OF  NOTIFICATION   DATED  25.8.1993  OF
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS.

ANNX.A7 - COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5.10.2015 IN CRL.MC
NO.13/2015 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:
-----------------------

              NIL


                                       //TRUE COPY/


                                       P.A TO JUDGE


ab



                             P.UBAID, J.
                  ---------------------------------------
                   Crl.M.C No.7253 of 2015
                  ---------------------------------------
                Dated this the 17th day of November, 2015


                            O R D E R

The petitioner herein is the accused in C.C. No.365/2014 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Attingal. His application before the learned Magistrate for permission to apply for a passport was rejected by order dated 17.10.2015 in C.M.P No.2914/2015. The aggrieved accused seeks orders under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure quashing the impugned order, and he seeks permission from this Court to apply for a passport. In another case before the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate II, Attingal the petitioner has already obtained favourable orders permitting him to apply for a passport, and permitting him to go abroad for a period of one year. This application is not seriously opposed by the State. There is reason to believe that the case may not come up for trial in the near future. The petitioner wants to go abroad in search of some job. His prospects for job cannot be denied or obstructed simply on the ground that there is some criminal prosecution. The case does not involve any Crl.M.C No.7253 of 2015 2 serious offence. It is appropriate that the petitioner is allowed to go abroad for a period of 18 months. In the result, this petition is allowed as follows:

a) The petitioner herein is permitted to apply for a passport before the second respondent, and he is permitted to go abroad for a period of 18 months.
b) The petitioner shall surrender his passport before the learned Magistrate before expiry of the period of 18 months from the date on which he went abroad.
c) If further permission is required, he can make application before the learned Magistrate, and on such application appropriate orders shall be passed by the learned Magistrate.

P.UBAID JUDGE ab