Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 60]

Calcutta High Court

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs West Bengal Infrastructure ... on 18 August, 2008

Author: Pinaki Chandra Ghose

Bench: Pinaki Chandra Ghose

                       ITA No.467 of 2008
                        G.A.No.2003 of 2008
                   IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                  Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax)



   COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-II
            Versus
   WEST BENGAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED


   BEFORE:
   The Hon'ble JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
                 AND
   The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANKAR PRASAD MITRA
   Date : 18th August, 2008.



                        The Court : We have perused the application

for condonation of delay.       We are satisfied that sufficient cause

has been shown in the petition to condone the delay of 80 days.

Hence delay is condoned. The application being G.A.No.2003 of 2008

is allowed.

                        We now take up the appeal. After hearing the

learned Advocate for the appellant the appeal is admitted and the

following     substantial     question        of     law        is      referred     for

adjudication:

                       "i)   Whether     on        the    facts       and    in    the

                       circumstances     of    the       case     the     Income   Tax

                       Appellate       Tribunal           was        justified      in

                       modifying    an    order          passed      by     it    after

                       considering the crux of the issue involved

                       under a miscellaneous application by a non
                                    2


                    speaking order, by simply stating that there

                    had been a factual mistake. In passing the

                    impugned order the Ld Tribunal exceeded its

                    jurisdiction       under   Section   254(2)   of   the

                    Income Tax Act, 1961?"


                    Let paper book be prepared by the appellant

and be served upon the respondent within eight weeks from date.

Let the appeal appear in the list ten weeks hence.

All parties concerned are to act on a xerox signed copy of this order on the usual undertakings.

Urgent xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J.) (SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, J.) pa.